Question

In: Economics

Suppose that the government decides to reduce the lump-sum taxes. Using the diagram, describe and explain...

Suppose that the government decides to reduce the lump-sum taxes. Using the diagram, describe and explain the effects of this policy on aggregate output, consumption, employment (or hours worked), and the real wage (note: you should diagram the effects on a graph with the production possibilities frontier and indifference curve).

Solutions

Expert Solution

Lump sum tax is the tax which needs to be paid by taxpayer needs to pay the specific amount irrespective of income i.e. paying same road tax, toll tax etc. When government reduces the lump sum tax everyone purchasing capacity rises. People start spending more on consumption goods which leads to increase in consumption level in the economy. There can be more goods produced in the economy with given resources which leads to PPF moving rightward and overall aggregate output rises.

Initially when there were taxes, the individual chooses point e, where the indifference curve is tangent to the AB budget constraint. When the tax are reduced, the budget constraint moves up to CD, and the individual chooses a point like g, where the new budget constraint is tangent to an indifference curve. The choice can be broken down into two effects. First one is income effect, shown by the movement from point e to point g, and second is substitution effect, the movement from point f to point g.

As working hours increased there is increase in labour supply which reduces the real wage in the market and overall when consumption and aggregate demand rises, employment must have risen in the economy.


Related Solutions

Suppose that the MPC is 0.75 and that this economy has lump sum taxes. 1. What...
Suppose that the MPC is 0.75 and that this economy has lump sum taxes. 1. What is the spending multiplier? 2. What is the tax multiplier? 3. What will happen to GDP if taxes increase by 1,200? 4. What would to GDP if spending decreases by 1,200? 5. What decreases in taxes would have the same effect on the economy as the increase in G in (d)? 6. Suppose that both income and taxes increase by 2,000. What is the...
The government decides to reduce income taxes for workers. Why does this increase employment? a) It...
The government decides to reduce income taxes for workers. Why does this increase employment? a) It gives a higher incentive to work b) It becomes cheaper to employ workers c) Investments are cheaper d) It increases the quality of labour
Consider the possibility that government spending increases produc- tivity so that with lump sum taxes after...
Consider the possibility that government spending increases produc- tivity so that with lump sum taxes after an increase in government spending the original equilibrium level of consumption and leisure is still just affordable. How will an increase in government spending af- fect consumption, hours worked, output and welfare? What if the new PPF is beyond the original one at this point?
In 2009, President Obama with Congressional approval increased government spending and decreased lump-sum taxes in response...
In 2009, President Obama with Congressional approval increased government spending and decreased lump-sum taxes in response to the financial crisis.   Graph and explain what happens in both the ISLM model and the ADAS model (with the upward sloping SRAS curve) in the short run. Be sure to discuss real output, real interest rate and the price level in your answer. Graph and explain what happens in the long run if the Fed does not change monetary policy. Be sure to...
Suppose the government is considering levying one of two taxes. The first tax is a lump...
Suppose the government is considering levying one of two taxes. The first tax is a lump sum tax which raises $200 from Terry, who has the usual-shaped preferences. The second tax is an excise tax on the consumption of internet services which also raises $200 from Terry. Which of the following statements is/are correct? Select one: a. Terry would be better off under the excise tax than under the lump sum tax b. Under the excise tax, the change in...
Suppose that the Federal government decides to reduce the tax advantage of municipal bonds, relative to...
Suppose that the Federal government decides to reduce the tax advantage of municipal bonds, relative to US Treasury bonds. In this case, we would expect that the equilibrium yield in the municipal bond market will ____ and the yield in the US Treasury bonds market will ____. Group of answer choices fall; rise fall; fall rise; rise rise; fall
Suppose the US government decides to decrease taxes, as it did on 22 December, 2017, use...
Suppose the US government decides to decrease taxes, as it did on 22 December, 2017, use the IS-LM model to discuss how the Fed can stabilize national income at a new equilibrium interest rate (b) Did the tax policy produce its intended impact on the IS curve? Why?
Suppose the government increases its expenditures with no change in taxes. Use the Keynesian cross diagram...
Suppose the government increases its expenditures with no change in taxes. Use the Keynesian cross diagram (the ZZ-Y diagram) to illustrate graphically and explain verbally what happens to equilibrium output in the goods market. Now use the ISLM model to illustrate graphically and explain verbally what happens to equilibrium income, the interest rate, and investment. Clearly explain the effects on investment. What would happen to equilibrium output if the increase in government expenditures was matched by an equal increase in...
A lump-sum increase in current taxes would cause interest rates to a) fall if Ricardian equivalence...
A lump-sum increase in current taxes would cause interest rates to a) fall if Ricardian equivalence held. b) fall if Ricardian equivalence did not hold. c) fall regardless of whether Ricardian equivalence held. d) rise.
Why do lump sum taxes have no effect on how much consumers spend on consumption or...
Why do lump sum taxes have no effect on how much consumers spend on consumption or the fraction of their income that they choose to save? in my macro class (using a made up economy), we used the assumption that lump taxes were autonomous. My professor said that this means a change in taxes would not affect the fraction of income the choose to spend on consumption or how much they decide to save. I don’t see how this is...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT