Many companies use split-offs as a means to unlock shareholder value. The split-off effectively splits the...

Many companies use split-offs as a means to unlock shareholder value. The split-off effectively splits the company into two pieces, each of which can then be valued separately by the stock market. If managers are compensated based on reported profit, how might they strategically structure the split-off? What corporate governance issues does this transaction present?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Split off is a mechanism where an asset is divided into number of units each carrying same value. the Split off methods are very prominently followed for appreciation in the value of Shareholders. the methods enables the shareholders to realize their value as -

A share trading at $100 would attract 1000,000 customers whereas a share trading at $10000 would restrict the number of customers to 10000 only. the fundamental reason behind this is the ability of the customers to buy such high value stocks. when there are higher of customers for a stock, there is liquidity in the market as well as momentum is also good. So, the price moves. But when the number of interested customers decreases, its momentum as well liquidity also goes down.

Hence, to ensure better return for their investment, liquidity and movement, it is a way to deliver to the customers.

If managers are compensated based on reported profit, they can strategically structure the split-off. this is by asking the company for Stocks in return as performance bonus instead of Cash or Cheque returns. With this they can not only secure their Cash salary on periodic basis but also secure appreciation due to Market inflation.

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

7.26 Sales-Value-at-Split-off Method Allocate the joint costs using the sales-value-at-split-off method. Alomar Company manufactures four products...

7.26 Sales-Value-at-Split-off Method Allocate the joint costs using the sales-value-at-split-off method. Alomar Company manufactures four products from a joint production process: barlon, selene, plicene, and corsol. The joint costs for one batch are as follows: Direct materials $67,900 Direct labor 34,000 Overhead 25,500 At the split-off point, a batch yields 1,400 barlon, 2,600 selene, 2,500 plicene, and 3,500 corsol. All products are sold at the split-off point: barlon sells for $15 per unit, selene sells for $20 per unit, plicene...

Explain four (4) reasons why a firm would prefer to use sales value at the split-off...

Explain four (4) reasons why a firm would prefer to use sales value at the split-off point

Distinguish between the sales value of the split-off method and the NRV method. Discuss the different...

Distinguish between the sales value of the split-off method and the NRV method. Discuss the different between the sale value of the split-off method and the NRV method of accounting for by-products, focsuing on what conditions are necessary to use each method.

28. A strategy of diversification is designed to increase shareholder value by acquiring other companies. Which...

28. A strategy of diversification is designed to increase shareholder value by acquiring other companies. Which of the following is not a good reason to diversify? a. leverage your resources and capabilities b. reduce cost/improve access to resources c. acquire technology assets or products that complement your present business d. company for sale can be bought cheap e. take advantage of a powerful or known brand 29. In addition to foreign acquisitions and export strategies, licensing, franchising and strategic alliances...

Computing Joint Costs—Sales Value at Split-Off and Net Realizable Value Methods LeMoyne Manufacturing Inc.’s joint cost...

Computing Joint Costs—Sales Value at Split-Off and Net Realizable Value Methods LeMoyne Manufacturing Inc.’s joint cost of producing 2,000 units of Product X, 1,000 units of Product Y, and 1,000 units of Product Z is $50,000. The unit sales values of the three products at the split-off point are Product X–$30, Product Y–$100, and Product Z–$90. Ending inventories include 200 units of Product X, 300 units of Product Y, and 100 units of Product Z. In your interim calculations, round...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 15,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $20,000; unders, $23,040. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 13,000 units of overs and 35,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $16,000; unders, $19,900. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated...

Carl corp. manufactures three products and allocates joint costs at its relative sales value of split-off...

Carl corp. manufactures three products and allocates joint costs at its relative sales value of split-off point. The following joint product cost were incurred for the current period. Raw materials $180,000 Direct labor $120,000 Factory Overhead $200,000 The following production data were provided by Carl corp. for current period: Product Name Unit Produced SP at SOP Separable Cost Final SP Milk 10,000 $ 20.00 $ 50,000 $ 24 Flour 20,000 $ 15.00 $ 60,000 $ 18 Butter 30,000 $ 12.50...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two...

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $18,000; unders, $23,040. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated...

Exercise 6-14 Computing Joint Costs—Sales Value at Split-Off and Net Realizable Value Methods LeMoyne Manufacturing Inc.’s...

Exercise 6-14 Computing Joint Costs—Sales Value at Split-Off and Net Realizable Value Methods LeMoyne Manufacturing Inc.’s joint cost of producing 2,000 units of Product X, 1,000 units of Product Y, and 1,000 units of Product Z is $50,000. The unit sales values of the three products at the split-off point are Product X–$30, Product Y–$100, and Product Z–$90. Ending inventories include 200 units of Product X, 300 units of Product Y, and 100 units of Product Z. In your interim...

Subjects