Question

In: Finance

Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment...

Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment (System A) for $19,000, which will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each of the next 6 years. Alternatively, the company can spend $14,000 for equipment that can be used for 3 years and will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each year (System B). If the company’s WACC is 5% and both “projects” can be repeated indefinitely, which system should be chosen, and what is its EAA? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest cent.

Choose project A or B whose EAA = S

Solutions

Expert Solution

Question:

Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment (System A) for $19,000, which will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each of the next 6 years. Alternatively, the company can spend $14,000 for equipment that can be used for 3 years and will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each year (System B). If the company’s WACC is 5% and both “projects” can be repeated indefinitely, which system should be chosen, and what is its EAA? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest cent.

Choose project A or B whose EAA = S

Solution:

1. Calculation of NPV & EAA for System A:

Given:

Initial Investment or Purchase Price of A = $ 19,000

Cash Flow per year = $ 7,000

Number of Years n = 6 Years

WACC = 5 %

To Calculate:

EAA i.e. Equivalent Annual Annuity

Formula:

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA = r × NPV / 1- (1 + r) ^ -n

Where:

r= Interest Rate or WACC

NPV = Net Present Value of Project

n= Number of Years

So, to calculate EAA, first of all we have to calculate the NPV of Project A whose formula is as follows:

Formula:

NPV = ∑ CFn / (1 + WACC) ^ n – Initial Investment

Where,

CFn = Cash Flow of the n Year

WACC = Interest Rate

n= Number of Years

Tabulation of the Calculation of NPV of System A:

Years

Cash Flow

Present Value = CFn / (1 + WACC) ^ n

Present Value Amount in $

1.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 1 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 1

6666.67

2.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 2 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 2

6349.21

3.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 3 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 3

6046.86

4.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 4 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 4

5758.92

5.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 5 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 5

5484.68

6.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 6 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 6

5223.51

Total

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 35,529.85

Less: Initial Purchase Price

     -$ 19,000.00

Net Present Value of System A

$ 16,529.85

Now we find the EAA of Project A:

Equivalent Annual Annuity

EAA = r × NPV / 1- (1 + r) ^ -n

On putting the values in the formula, we get,

= (0.05 × 16,529.85) / (1 – (1 + 0.05) ^-6)

= 826.49 / 1- (1.05) ^-6

= 826.49 / 1- 0.7462

= 826.49 / 0.2538

= $ 3256.46

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA of Project A = $ 3256.46

2. Calculation of NPV & EAA for System B:

Given:

Initial Investment or Purchase Price of B = $ 14,000

Cash Flow per year = $ 7,000

Number of Years n = 3 Years

WACC = 5 %

To Calculate:

EAA i.e. Equivalent Annual Annuity

Formula:

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA = r × NPV / 1- (1 + r) ^ -n

Where:

r= Interest Rate or WACC

NPV = Net Present Value of Project

n= Number of Years

So, to calculate EAA, first of all we have to calculate the NPV of Project B whose formula is as follows:

Formula:

NPV = ∑ CFn / (1 + WACC) ^ n – Initial Investment

Where,

CFn = Cash Flow of the n Year

WACC = Interest Rate

n= Number of Years

Tabulation of the Calculation of NPV of System B:

Years

Cash Flow

Present Value = CFn / (1 + WACC) ^ n

Present Value Amount in $

1.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 1 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 1

6666.67

2.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 2 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 2

6349.21

3.

$7,000

7000 / (1 + 0.05) ^ 3 = 7000 / 1.05 ^ 3

6046.86

Total

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 19,062.74

Less: Initial Purchase Price

     -$ 14,000.00

Net Present Value of System B

$ 5,062.74

Now we find the EAA of Project B:

Equivalent Annual Annuity

EAA = r × NPV / 1- (1 + r) ^ -n

On putting the values in the formula, we get,

= (0.05 × 5,062.74) / (1 – (1 + 0.05) ^-3)

= 253.137 / 1- (1.05) ^-3

= 253.137 / 1- 0.8638

= 253.137 / 0.1362

= $ 1858.57

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA of Project B = $ 1858.57

Ans:

Methods

Project A

Project B

Analytical Decision

Net Present Value NPV

$ 16,529.85

$ 5,062.74

"Project A should be Chosen"

Project A is better than B in NPV:

NPV of A > NPV of B

= $ 16,529.85 > $ 5,062.74

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA

$ 3256.46

$ 1858.57

"Project A should be Chosen"

Project A is better than B in EAA:

EAA of A > EAA of B

$ 3256.46 > $ 1858.57

Project A should be chosen because its Net Present Value is greater than that of Project B. Also according to EAA criteria Project A should be chosen as EAA of Project A is also greater than EAA of Project B.


Related Solutions

Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment...
Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment (System A) for $19,000, which will generate cash flows of $9,000 at the end of each of the next 6 years. Alternatively, the company can spend $13,000 for equipment that can be used for 3 years and will generate cash flows of $9,000 at the end of each year (System B). If the company’s WACC is 5% and both “projects” can be repeated indefinitely,...
Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment...
Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment (System A) for $24,000, which will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each of the next 6 years. Alternatively, the company can spend $11,000 for equipment that can be used for 3 years and will generate cash flows of $7,000 at the end of each year (System B). If the company’s WACC is 10% and both “projects” can be repeated indefinitely,...
Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment...
Faleye Consulting is deciding which of two computer systems to purchase. It can purchase state-of-the-art equipment (System A) for $21,000, which will generate cash flows of $10,000 at the end of each of the next 6 years. Alternatively, the company can spend $12,000 for equipment that can be used for 3 years and will generate cash flows of $10,000 at the end of each year (System B). If the company’s WACC is 10% and both “projects” can be repeated indefinitely,...
A consulting firm is considering the purchase a new computer drafting system for $120,000. It is...
A consulting firm is considering the purchase a new computer drafting system for $120,000. It is expected this will eliminate one employee, who with benefits earns $32,000 annually. Annual operating and maintenance cost for the new system will be $4,000. The firm believes that in 7 years the system will be obsolete and have a salvage value of 10% of the first cost. Using as an annual interest rate of 10%, decide on the economic viability of the plan. Use...
Your consulting organization has been hired to develop computer systems for the United Nations in the...
Your consulting organization has been hired to develop computer systems for the United Nations in the Middle East. Create a Risk Information Sheet for at least five potential risks that should be considered. At least three of the risks you choose should be business continuity and IT disaster recovery related. As part of this, consider man-made and natural risks that might apply to this particular situation. Please note the following: The risk description should fully describe the risk The probability...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems consulting, and software training. Carol Bingham, a pricing analyst, has been asked to develop total costs for the functional areas. These costs will be used as a guide in pricing a new contract. In computing these costs, Carol is considering three different methods of the departmental allocation approach to allocate overhead costs: the direct method, the step method, and the reciprocal method. She assembled...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems consulting, and software training. Carol Bingham, a pricing analyst, has been asked to develop total costs for the functional areas. These costs will be used as a guide in pricing a new contract. In computing these costs, Carol is considering three different methods of the departmental allocation approach to allocate overhead costs: the direct method, the step method, and the reciprocal method. She assembled...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems consulting, and software training. Carol Bingham, a pricing analyst, has been asked to develop total costs for the functional areas. These costs will be used as a guide in pricing a new contract. In computing these costs, Carol is considering three different methods of the departmental allocation approach to allocate overhead costs: the direct method, the step method, and the reciprocal method. She assembled...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems consulting, and software training. Carol Bingham, a pricing analyst, has been asked to develop total costs for the functional areas. These costs will be used as a guide in pricing a new contract. In computing these costs, Carol is considering three different methods of the departmental allocation approach to allocate overhead costs: the direct method, the step method, and the reciprocal method. She assembled...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems...
Data Performance, a computer software consulting company, has three major functional areas: computer programming, information systems consulting, and software training. Carol Bingham, a pricing analyst, has been asked to develop total costs for the functional areas. These costs will be used as a guide in pricing a new contract. In computing these costs, Carol is considering three different methods of the departmental allocation approach to allocate overhead costs: the direct method, the step method, and the reciprocal method. She assembled...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT