Question

In: Accounting

Passage of the 16th amendment to the Constitution was actually the third major attempt to impose...

Passage of the 16th amendment to the Constitution was actually the third major attempt to impose an income tax (individual or corporate) in the US. What were the first two, and what caused their failure?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Yes, it is true that 16th amendment to the Constitution was actually the third major attempt to impose an income tax (individual or corporate) in the US. 16th amendment to the consitution was done 1909 but it was ratified in 1903 which empowered congrees to impose taxes on the individuals & corporations.

Before this 16th amendment two attemp was made which was known as follow;

1. Revenue Act of 1861

2. A flat rate Federal income tax was implemented in 1894 OR Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act of 1894

But these two attempts were failed to achieve determined goals due to followings reasons;

1. Revenue Act of 1861;

U.S. government tried to raise funds for meeting additional funds requirements which arised due to war. But objectives of this revenue act did not achieved because this act was paased hastily so proper taxation mechanism could not be developed for proper implementation of this revenue act that is why this attempt of U.S. government to raise additional funds failed in meeting desired goals. As we know that for successful implementation of any revenue & tax Act, a proper government mechanism is pre-requirement so that all types of loopholes & errors can be eliminated and required revenues can be raised, but such government’s mechanism was not developed at that time that is why this attempt was failed.

2. A flat rate Federal income tax of 1894 OR Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act of 1894;

As we know that in 1894 government passed a new Act which is known as A flat rate Federal income tax of 1894 OR Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act of 1894 for meeting its revenues demands but this Act was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court because it was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state. That is why this attempt of the U.S. government also failed in meeting requirements of the government.


Related Solutions

Discuss the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution then discuss the erosion of the 14th Amendment...
Discuss the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution then discuss the erosion of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
discuss the all inclusive view of revenue as described in the 16th amendment
discuss the all inclusive view of revenue as described in the 16th amendment
The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.What is your...
The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.What is your position on the proposed repealing of the amendment, and why did you reach that conclusion?
Why would a Monetarist advocate a balanced budget amendment to the constitution?
Why would a Monetarist advocate a balanced budget amendment to the constitution?
1. Discuss the all inclusive view of revenue as described in the 16th amendment. 2. What...
1. Discuss the all inclusive view of revenue as described in the 16th amendment. 2. What is the purpose of regulations?
As a result of federal laws and the 14th amendment to the us constitution federal courts...
As a result of federal laws and the 14th amendment to the us constitution federal courts _________
Could the Federal Government dictate equal rights for women without an Amendment to the Constitution? In...
Could the Federal Government dictate equal rights for women without an Amendment to the Constitution? In a multitude of articles and internet blogs it seems to be very challenging when dealing with the actions of an administrative agency. How successfully normally are these challenges?
Explain the 14th amendment. Why was it written and how did it change the Constitution? How...
Explain the 14th amendment. Why was it written and how did it change the Constitution? How did affect federalism?
Defend the passage of both Regulation FD, and Sarbanes-Oxley and the costs that they impose on...
Defend the passage of both Regulation FD, and Sarbanes-Oxley and the costs that they impose on the firm in the context of information asymmetry costs.
How does the principle of separation of powers actually shape the constitution?
How does the principle of separation of powers actually shape the constitution?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT