In: Accounting
Becton Labs, Inc., produces various chemical compounds for industrial use. One compound, called Fludex, is prepared using an elaborate distilling process. The company has developed standard costs for one unit of Fludex, as follows:
Standard Quantity or Hours |
Standard Price or Rate |
Standard Cost | |||||
Direct materials | 2.20 | ounces | $ | 25.00 | per ounce | $ | 55.00 |
Direct labor | 0.50 | hours | $ | 15.00 | per hour | 7.50 | |
Variable manufacturing overhead | 0.50 | hours | $ | 3.00 | per hour | 1.50 | |
Total standard cost per unit | $ | 64.00 | |||||
During November, the following activity was recorded related to the production of Fludex:
Materials purchased, 12,000 ounces at a cost of $282,000.
There was no beginning inventory of materials; however, at the end of the month, 2,750 ounces of material remained in ending inventory.
The company employs 25 lab technicians to work on the production of Fludex. During November, they each worked an average of 110 hours at an average pay rate of $11.50 per hour.
Variable manufacturing overhead is assigned to Fludex on the basis of direct labor-hours. Variable manufacturing overhead costs during November totaled $2,400.
During November, the company produced 4,100 units of Fludex.
Required:
1. For direct materials:
a. Compute the price AND quantity variances.
b. The materials were purchased from a new supplier who is anxious to enter into a long-term purchase contract. Would you recommend that the company sign the contract?
2. For direct labor:
a. Compute the rate AND efficiency variances.
b. In the past, the 25 technicians employed in the production of Fludex consisted of 5 senior technicians and 20 assistants. During November, the company experimented with fewer senior technicians and more assistants in order to reduce labor costs. Would you recommend that the new labor mix be continued?
3. Compute the variable overhead rate AND efficiency variances.
Actual DATA for |
4100 |
units |
|
Quantity (AQ) |
Rate (AR) |
Actual Cost |
|
[A] |
[B] |
[A x B] |
|
Direct Material |
9250 ounces [12000 – 2750] |
$ 23.50 [282000/12000] |
$ 2,17,375.00 |
Direct labor |
2750 hours [25 x 110 hours] |
$ 11.50 |
$ 31,625.00 |
Variable Overhead |
2750 hours |
$ 0.87 [2400 / 2750] |
$ 2,400.00 |
Standard DATA for |
4100 |
units |
|
Quantity (SQ) |
Rate (SR) |
Standard Cost |
|
[A] |
[B] |
[A x B] |
|
Direct Material |
9020 ounces [4100 x 2.2] |
$ 25.00 |
$ 2,25,500.00 |
Direct labor |
2050 hours [4100 x 0.5 hours] |
$ 15.00 |
$ 30,750.00 |
Variable Overhead |
2050 |
$ 3.00 |
$ 6,150.00 |
‘a’
Material Price Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Rate |
- |
Actual Rate |
) |
x |
Actual Quantity |
( |
$ 25.00 |
- |
$ 23.50 |
) |
x |
9250 |
13875 |
||||||
Variance |
13875 |
Favourable-F |
||||
Material Quantity Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Quantity |
- |
Actual Quantity |
) |
x |
Standard Rate |
( |
9020 |
- |
9250 |
) |
x |
$ 25.00 |
-5750 |
||||||
Variance |
5750 |
Unfavourable-U |
||||
Material Spending Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Cost |
- |
Actual Cost |
) |
||
( |
$ 2,25,500.00 |
- |
$ 2,17,375.00 |
) |
||
8125 |
||||||
Variance |
8125 |
Favourable-F |
‘b’
YES, the company should be recommended to sign the contract with the said new supplier because the material rate is below than standard rate for material, and there is existence of Favourable material price variance.
‘a’
Labor Rate Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Rate |
- |
Actual Rate |
) |
x |
Actual Labor Hours |
( |
$ 15.00 |
- |
$ 11.50 |
) |
x |
2750 |
9625 |
||||||
Variance |
9625 |
Favourable-F |
||||
Labour Efficiency Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Hours |
- |
Actual Hours |
) |
x |
Standard Rate |
( |
2050 |
- |
2750 |
) |
x |
$ 15.00 |
-10500 |
||||||
Variance |
10500 |
Unfavourable-U |
||||
Labor Spending Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Cost |
- |
Actual Cost |
) |
||
( |
$ 30,750.00 |
- |
$ 31,625.00 |
) |
||
-875 |
||||||
Variance |
875 |
Unfavourable-U |
‘b’
In order to reduce labor cost, few technicians were employed and more assistant were used in November. However this resulted in consumption of more hours than budgeted leading to Unfavourable Labor efficiency variance. The effect of which was so intense that it neautralized the positive favourable labor rate variance. Hence, this new labor mix should be DISCONTINUED.
Variable Overhead Rate Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Rate |
- |
Actual Rate |
) |
x |
Actual Labor Hours |
( |
$ 3.00 |
- |
$ 0.87 |
) |
x |
2750 |
5850 |
||||||
Variance |
5850 |
Favourable-F |
||||
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Hours |
- |
Actual Hours |
) |
x |
Standard Rate |
( |
2050 |
- |
2750 |
) |
x |
$ 3.00 |
-2100 |
||||||
Variance |
2100 |
Unfavourable-U |
||||
Variable Overhead Spending Variance |
||||||
( |
Standard Cost |
- |
Actual Cost |
) |
||
( |
$ 6,150.00 |
- |
$ 2,400.00 |
) |
||
3750 |
||||||
Variance |
3750 |
Favourable-F |