In: Finance
The Everly Equipment Company's flange-lipping machine was purchased 5 years ago for $45,000. It had an expected life of 10 years when it was bought and its remaining depreciation is $4,500 per year for each year of its remaining life. As older flange-lippers are robust and useful machines, this one can be sold for $20,000 at the end of its useful life.
A new high-efficiency digital-controlled flange-lipper can be purchased for $160,000, including installation costs. During its 5-year life, it will reduce cash operating expenses by $35,000 per year, although it will not affect sales. At the end of its useful life, the high-efficiency machine is estimated to be worthless. MACRS depreciation will be used, and the machine will be depreciated over its 3-year class life rather than its 5-year economic life, so the applicable depreciation rates are 33.33%, 44.45%, 14.81%, and 7.41%.
The old machine can be sold today for $45,000. The firm's tax rate is 25%, and the appropriate cost of capital is 12%.
If the new flange-lipper is purchased, what is the amount of the initial cash flow at Year 0? Round your answer to the nearest dollar. Cash outflow, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign.
$
What are the incremental net cash flows that will occur at the end of Years 1 through 5? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Cash outflows, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign.
CF1 | $ |
CF2 | $ |
CF3 | $ |
CF4 | $ |
CF5 | $ |
What is the NPV of this project? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar. Negative value, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign.
$
Should Everly replace the flange-lipper?
Part a : Initial Cash Flow at Year 0
Net Cash Outflow in year 0 = Cost of New Machine - Sales value of Old Machine
= $160,000 - $ 45,000
Net Cash Outflow in year 0 = $1,15,000
Part b : Incremental cash Flows from Year 1 to Year 5
Year | Cash Flow | Depreciation | Tax saving on depreciation | Net Cash Inflow |
a | b | c | d=c*.25 | e=b+d |
1 | $35,000.00 | $53,330.00 | $13,332.50 | $48,333 |
2 | $35,000.00 | $71,120.00 | $17,780.00 | $52,780 |
3 | $35,000.00 | $23,695.00 | $5,923.75 | $40,924 |
4 | $35,000.00 | $11,855.00 | $2,963.75 | $37,964 |
5 | $35,000.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $35,000 |
Part C : NPV of the project
Year | Cash Flow | Depreciation | Tax saving on depreciation | Net Cash flow | PVF @ 12% | Present Value |
a | b | c | d=c*.25 | e=b+d | f | g=e*f |
0 | -$115,000.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | -$115,000 | 1 | -$115,000 |
1 | $35,000.00 | $53,330.00 | $13,332.50 | $48,333 | 0.893 | $43,154 |
2 | $35,000.00 | $71,120.00 | $17,780.00 | $52,780 | 0.797 | $42,076 |
3 | $35,000.00 | $23,695.00 | $5,923.75 | $40,924 | 0.712 | $29,129 |
4 | $35,000.00 | $11,855.00 | $2,963.75 | $37,964 | 0.636 | $24,127 |
5 | $35,000.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $35,000 | 0.567 | $19,860 |
NPV | $43,345 |
Based on the above table, we can conclude that since the NPV of the project is positive, therefore the machine should be replaced.
Please upvote the answer if
it was of help to you.
In case of any doubt just comment below, I would love to
help.