In: Statistics and Probability
(3) Suppose that you run a regression of wage on a set of independent variables: age, years of education, experience, and a dummy variable married. There are 100 observations, i.e., n=100. You want to test whether all the coefficient and intercept estimates in the equation for married and unmarried are equal to each other. i.e.,
Married: wage = β0 + β1*age + β2*educ + β3*exper + uUnmarried: wage = α0 + α1*age + α2*educ + α3*exper + v
(a) Write down the null hypothesis and alternative
hypothesis.
(b) Write down the formula to calculate the Chow statistic. You
don’t need to compute a numerical value. Just provide the
formula.
(b) Suppose the critical value is 2.5. When will the null
hypothesis get rejected?
(4) Provide the steps of implementing a hypothesis test.
(5) What is the formula for variance estimator in White(1980) to
deal with heteroskedasticity?
a)
Null Hypothesis:
H0: Pooled model is correct ie there is no significant improvement in fit from running two regressions.
Alternate Hypothesis:
Ha: Pooled model is not correct ie there is significant improvement in fit from running two regressions.
b)
RSSA is defined as the RSS using only subsample of Married
RSSB is defined as the RSS using only subsample of Unmarried
RSSP is defined as the RSS using the entire(pooled) sample
The Chow test is an F test with the following F-statistic:
F = {(RSSP – RSSA – RSSB )/k}/ {(RSSA + RSSB)/(n-2k)}
where k is the number of parameters in pooled model
c)
If our F value is greater than critical value, then we reject the null hypothesis ie if out F value is greater than 2.5, we will reject the null hypothesis.
4)
The steps of a hypothesis test are:
5)
Steps of testing heteroskedasticity are:
The degrees of freedom for the F-test are equal to 2 in the numerator and n – 3 in the denominator. The degrees of freedom for the chi-squared test are 2. If the test statistics is significant, then we have evidence of heteroskedasticity. If not, we fail to reject the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity.