Question

In: Statistics and Probability

R.A Fisher advanced the "constitutional hypothesis:" there is a genetic factor that disposes you both to...

R.A Fisher advanced the "constitutional hypothesis:" there is a genetic factor that disposes you both to smoke and die. To refute Fisher's idea, the epidemiologists used twins studies. They identified sets of smoking-discordant monozygotic twin pairs. Now there is a race. Which twin dies first, the smoker or non-smoker? Data from the Finnish twin study are shown below.

Data from Finnish Twin Study

Cause of Death for Smokers and Non-smokers
Smokers Non-smokers
All Causes 17 5
Coronary Heart Diseases 9 0
Lung Cancer 2 0

According to the first line of the table, there were 22 smoking-discordant monozygotic twin pairs where at least one twin of the pair died. In 17 cases the smoker died first; in 5 cases the non-smoker died first. According to the second line, there were 9 pairs where at least one twin died of coronary heart disease; in all 9 cases, the smoker died first. According to the last line, there were 2 pairs where at least one twin died from lung cancer, and in both pairs, the smoker won the race to death. (Lung cancer is a rare disease, even among smokers.)

For parts (a-c), suppose that each twin in the pair is equally likely to die first, so the number of pairs in which the smoker dies first is like the number of heads in coin-tossing.

(a) On this basis, what is the chance of having 17 or more pairs out of 22 where the smoker dies first?

(b) Repeat the test in part (a), for the 9 deaths from coronary heart disease.

(c) Repeat the test in part (a), for the 2 deaths from lung cancer.

(d) Can the difference between the death rates for smoking and non-smoking twins be explained by ...

(i) chance?

(ii) genetics?

(iii) health effects of smoking?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

The sample size of 22 will have a binomial distribution with parameters n=22 and p=0.5. The probability is obtained in excel using the function =BINOM.DIST(number_s, trials, probability_s, cumulative).

The screenshot is shown below,

P(X>=17) = 1 - P(X<=16)

P(X>=17) = 0.00845

b)

The sample size of 9 will have a binomial distribution with parameters n=9 and p=0.5. The probability is obtained in excel. The screenshot is shown below,

P(X=9) = 0.0020

c)

The sample size of 2 will have a binomial distribution with parameters n=2 and p=0.5. The probability is obtained in excel. The screenshot is shown below,

d)

Since the probability for the observed death is very small we can say that the difference between the death rates for smoking and non-smoking twins can not be explained by chance. Which means there may be genetic influence or health effects of smoking responsible for the difference between the death rates for smoking and non-smoking.


Related Solutions

Both F factor (a plasmid) and bacteriophages can be viewed as mobile genetic parasites. Describe some...
Both F factor (a plasmid) and bacteriophages can be viewed as mobile genetic parasites. Describe some similarities between these different genetic elements. What do these similarities suggest about the evolutionary history of plasmids and bacteriophages?
What is high risk factor between lifestyle and genetic factor that causes breast cancer in the...
What is high risk factor between lifestyle and genetic factor that causes breast cancer in the context of obesity, please elaborate both factors, please explain each factor?
The hypothesis of most interest to the researcher is: the alternative hypothesis. the null hypothesis. both...
The hypothesis of most interest to the researcher is: the alternative hypothesis. the null hypothesis. both hypotheses are of equal interest. Neither hypothesis is of interest.
15) Both the founder event and genetic bottlenecking A. Increase the genetic variability of a new...
15) Both the founder event and genetic bottlenecking A. Increase the genetic variability of a new population after the event. B. Always lead to extinctions. C. Decrease the genetic variability of a new population after the event. D. Are always caused by natural disasters.
what do you consider to be the most important factor in determining the valuation of both...
what do you consider to be the most important factor in determining the valuation of both bonds and equities? (Note that valuation is either the market price of the bond, or the current stock price.) In your post explain both the reason you believe this is the more important factor and how that factor varies with different market conditions.
1. State the research hypothesis (non-directional) and the null hypothesis. Make sure you include both DV...
1. State the research hypothesis (non-directional) and the null hypothesis. Make sure you include both DV and IV in the hypotheses from #1 above 2.According to the post-hoc results table, which pairs of the cottages do show the statistically significant difference in “Number of traumas experienced” (e.g. “Cottage A vs. B”)? SPSS Dataset SPSS Data for HW (500 cases).sav (available in Canvas) Variable Names in the dataset cottage: Cottage assignment (Cottage A, B, & C) trauma: Number of traumas experienced...
How do constitutional powers give both the executive and legislative branches the authority to engage in...
How do constitutional powers give both the executive and legislative branches the authority to engage in foreign policy?
Genetic deficiency in RAG-1 and genetic deficiency in TAP1 both lead to the same outcome: severe...
Genetic deficiency in RAG-1 and genetic deficiency in TAP1 both lead to the same outcome: severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), in which a patient has an almost completely nonfunctional adaptive immune response and is unable to fight off infections with normally harmless microbial organisms. ​EXPLAIN WHY​ deficiency in these two very different genes has the same clinical outcome. How will RAG-1 deficiency affect the immune system? How will TAP1 deficiency affect the immune system? How are these outcomes similar, and how...
Is it possible to not reject both the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis? It kinda sounds...
Is it possible to not reject both the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis? It kinda sounds impossible by common sense, so I wonder if there's an error in my working, thanks for your help/ In a condition of n=84, (sample mean) = 0.4302, s (sample STDV) = 0.260, d.f.= 83, level of significance 0.05, confidence level 95%, critical value (one tailed) 1.663 I have made a null hypothesis and alternative of H₀: μ (the "estimated" population mean) ≤ 0.453 and...
In hypothesis testing, we can reject a. the null hypothesis. b. the alternative hypothesis. c. both...
In hypothesis testing, we can reject a. the null hypothesis. b. the alternative hypothesis. c. both the null and the alternative hypotheses. d. neither the null and the alternative hypotheses.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT