In: Economics
Sam has two choices at Chick-fil-A, chicken sandwiches (on x-axis) and waffle fries (on y-axis). Each chicken sandwich costs 3 dollars and each order of waffle fries costs 1.5 dollars. If the price of chicken sandwiches (good X) falls to 2 dollars,
Sam’s budget constraint will shift to the right. |
||
Sam’s budget constraint will become flatter. |
||
Sam’s budget set will become smaller. |
||
Sam will be worse off. |
Sma's budget constraint will be : 3S + 1.5W = M where S is the number of sandwiches and W is the number of waffles consumed and M is given income level.
Now if price of sandwiches falls to 2 , the new budget constraint will be 2S + 1.5W = M . This will rotate the budget constraint , hinged at y axis, outward to the right , as consumer will be able to consume more of x now.
Now, Sam will not be worse off as he will be able to afford the bundles to the right of original budget constraint which were not affordable earlier.
His budget set will increase and not go smaller.
The budget constraint will become flatter as the slope reduces from 3/1.5 to 2/1.5.
And the budget constraint will not "shift" to the right it will "rotate at y axis " outward to the right.
Hence option b is correct.