In: Statistics and Probability
Should we give heroin addicts heroin to cut crime?
A recent article in the BBC ( Durham Police to give drug addicts heroin in bid to cut crime (Links to an external site.)) it was suggested that heroin addicts be given the Class A drug in supervised "shooting galleries" to Durham England addicts in a bid to tackle drug-related crime.
"Durham Police is to become the first force in the country (UK)
to introduce a scheme in which users are treated with diamorphine -
medical grade heroin.
Ron Hogg, County Durham's Police, Crime and Victims' Commissioner,
says such treatment lowers offending levels.
Opponents claim trials have not shown significant benefits.
Mr Hogg told BBC Newcastle existing national policies had not been
effective and pointed to six-year trials in Darlington, London and
Brighton which he said had helped wean users off the drug.
Addicts were given the opiate in consumption rooms, often referred
to as "shooting galleries", supervised by medical
professionals.
"It got them back into a normal life and it cut crime," he
said.
"We saw health benefits for the individuals, we saw needles being
taken off the street, so there's an awful lot of evidence both in
the UK and across the world that such schemes do actually
work.
"All police and crime commissioners spend a lot of money on what we
call diversionary work - community projects and youth offending
schemes - because we know this will stop people committing
crime.
"This is just an extension of that rationale. The controversiality
is because it's drugs."
'Not unusual'
Mr Hogg said the UK had the highest rate of heroin, cocaine and
ecstasy use across the European Union with drug-induced deaths
totalling 45 people per million compared with 17 per million in the
EU.
Aiming to introduce the scheme "by the end of this year", he added
the force's public health partners were working out the cost of
administering the drug to users twice-daily.
He previously mooted such a move in 2013.
"If we go back to the 1960s, doctors used to prescribe heroin as
a means of treating someone back to recovery. It's not that
unusual," he said.
"We've got to consider the Misuse of Drugs Act has been in since
1971 and we haven't arrested the way out of the problem, have
we?"
A Home Office spokesman said there was evidence "supervised use of
[diamorphine] in a medical environment as part of a treatment plan
can help keep patients in treatment and out of criminal
behaviour".
However, David Raynes of the National Drug Prevention Alliance,
warned the move "will not stop addicts being addicts".
"It doesn't stop people using street drugs," he said.
"It may reduce crime marginally, but it doesn't reduce crime
permanently."
Discussion Question
Working together as a group, design a study to address whether this method is effective or not in reducing crime due to heroin addiction. Ron Hogg of County Durham's Police believes it works while David Raynes of the National Drug Prevention Alliance is skeptical. Your job is to help settle the argument using a statistical study. You will need to address the following in your write up:
The population of interest will be those of heron drug addicts
The null and alternative hypothesis are as
Null Hypothesis: There are no significant benefits of treatment(supervised drugs) in reducing the crime rate
Alternative Hypothesis: The treatment benefits in terms of reducing crime
The data collected will be categorical that is we will have two categories. One which commits crime after treatment and value 1 may be assigned and others which do not commit crime after treatment and value 0 may be assigned
In order to get a representative and unbiased sample any suitable probability sampling technique(e.g Stratified sampling.Systematic sampling, etc) can be used
The tests for proportions can be used and the tests of associativity can be used. For example, the Chi-square test for association can be used to test whether the crime rate is associated with the treatment
When the study is statistically significant, the alternative hypothesis will be supported and p-value will be less than 0.05. Clearly, we may have rejected true null hypothisis, thus type 1 error could have occurred.
When the study is statistically insignificant, the null hypothesis is supported and p-value will be greater than 0.05. There are chances of type 2 error as we may reject true alternative hypothesis.
Thank You.Please, Upvote.