In: Accounting
Contrast two different methods of estimating bad debts. Create simple examples.
There are two methods: Bad debts based on % of sales, based on % of receivable
| Bad debts based on % of sale | Bad debts based on % of receivable | 
| Estimation for allowance is based on current period credit sale | Estimatio is based on the existing receivable from past credit sales | 
| The determination of bad debts is the current period addition to the existing provision for bad debts | The determination of bad debts is the total bad debts provision required for the closing receivable. The difference between the existing provision and the closing provision is the current period P&L provision | 
| Formula = sales * estimated % | Formula = Closing receivable * estimated provision % | 
| The method is unrealistic and fails to estimate the difference in the estimate for the prior period receivables as against the original estimate. | The method is realistic and estimates the difference in the estimate for the prior period receivables as against the original estimate. | 
| Any change in the estimate is only prospective and does not change our bad debts evaluation of prior period sale | Any change in the estimate is on the entire receivable and does change our bad debts evaluation of prior period sale | 
| Multiple % estimation is not possible | Multiple % could be applied based on ageing of receivables to estimate bad debts accurately | 
| Eg: | Eg | 
| Sales= 100 | Sales 100 | 
| Estimate =1% | receivable closing = 200 | 
| Then bad debts provision is 1 | Estimate 1% | 
| Opening bad debts provision = 1 | Opening bad debts provision = 1 | 
| Closing bad debt provision = 2 | Closing bad debt provision = 200*1% | 
| Receivable closing = 2 | Closing bad debt provision =2 | 
| Post bad debt provision adjustment receivable is 199 | Post bad debt provision adjustment receivable is 200-2 = 198 |