Question

In: Accounting

On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s voting stock for $288,000....

On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s voting stock for $288,000. Birch reported a $300,000 book value, and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $72,000 on that date. Then, on January 1, 2017, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $104,000 when Cedar had a $100,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $26,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to a trade name with a 30-year remaining life.

These companies report the following financial information. Investment income figures are not included.

2016

2017

2018

Sales:

Aspen Company

$415,000

$545,000

$688,000

Birch Company

200,000

280,000

400,000

Cedar Company

Not available

160,000

210,000

Expenses:

Aspen Company

$310,000

$420,000

$510,000

Birch Company

160,000

220,000

335,000

Cedar Company

Not available

150,000

180,000

Dividends declared:

Aspen Company

$ ?20,000

$?40,000

$?50,000

Birch Company

10,000

20,000

20,000

Cedar Company

Not available

2,000

10,000

Assume that each of the following questions is independent:

If all companies use the equity method for internal reporting purposes, what is the December 31, 2017, balance in Aspen’s Investment in Birch Company account?

What is the consolidated net income for this business combination for 2018?

What is the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2018?

Assume that Birch made intra-entity inventory transfers to Aspen that have resulted in the following intra-entity gross profits in inventory at the end of each year:

Date

Amount

12/31/16

?$10,000

12/31/17

?16,000

12/31/18

?25,000

What is the accrual-based net income of Birch in 2017 and 2018, respectively?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)
Consideration transferred (by Aspen) $288,000
Noncontrolling interest fair value $72,000
Birch’s business fair value $360,000
Book value -$300,000
Trade name $60,000
Life 30 years
Annual amortization = $60000/30 $2,000
Consideration transferred for Cedar (by Birch) $104,000
Noncontrolling interest fair value $26,000
Cedar’s business fair value $130,000
Book value -$100,000
Excess to trade name $30,000
Life 30 years
Annual amortization = 30000/30 $1,000
Investment in Birch $288,000
Birch's reported income-2012 $40,000
Amortization expense -$2,000
Accrual-based income $38,000
Aspen’s percentage ownership 80.00%
Equity accrual-2012 $30,400
Dividends received 2012 (-10000 x 80%) -$8,000
Birch's reported income-2013 $60,000
Amortization expense -$2,000
Income from Cedar [80% x (10000-1000] $7,200
Accrual-based income $65,200
Aspen’s percentage ownership 80.00%
Equity accrual-2013 $52,160
Dividends received from Birch 2013 (20000 x 80%) -$16,000
Investment in Birch 12-31-13 $346,560
b)
Consolidated sales(total for the companies) $1,298,000
Consolidated expenses (total for the companies) -$1,025,000
Total amortization expense (see a.) -$3,000
Consolidated net income for 2014 $270,000
c)
Cedar’s NCI in consolidated net income
Revenues less expenses $30,000
Excess amortization -$1,000
Accrual-based income $29,000
Noncontrolling interest percentage x20%
Cedar’s NCI in consolidated net income $5,800
Birch's NCI in consolidated Net income
Revenues less expenses $65,000
Excess amortization -$2,000
Equity in Cedar income [(42,400 – 1,200) × 80%] $23,200
Realized2014 income of Birch $86,200
Noncontrolling interest percentage x20%
Birch’s NCI in consolidated net income $17,240
Total NCIshare of 2014 consolidated net income $23,040
d)
2013 Realized income of Birch (prior to accounting for unrealized gross profit) (see a) $65,200
2012 Transfer-gross profit recognized in 2013 $10,000
2013 Transfer-gross profit to be recognized in 2014 -$16,000
2013 Realized income - Birch $59,200
2014 Realized income of Birch (prior to accounting for unrealized gross profit) (part c) $86,200
2013 Transfer-gross profit recognized in 2014 16000
2014 Transfer-gross profit to be recognized in 2015 -25000
2014 Realized income—Birch $77,200

Related Solutions

On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $424,000....
On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $424,000. Birch reported a $425,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $106,000 on that date. Then, on January 1, 2017, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $232,000 when Cedar had a $218,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $58,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary's excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to...
On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $460,000....
On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $460,000. Birch reported a $470,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $115,000 on that date. Then, on January 1, 2017, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $164,000 when Cedar had a $124,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $41,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary's excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to...
On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $504,000....
On January 1, 2016, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $504,000. Birch reported a $510,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $126,000 on that date. Then, on January 1, 2017, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $160,000 when Cedar had a $164,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $40,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary's excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for $490,000. Birch reported a $477,500 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $122,500 on that date. Also, on January 1, 2013, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $192,000 when Cedar had a $141,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $48,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for $504,000. Birch reported a $510,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $126,000 on that date. Also, on January 1, 2013, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $160,000 when Cedar had a $164,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $40,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for $504,000. Birch reported a $510,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $126,000 on that date. Also, on January 1, 2013, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $160,000 when Cedar had a $164,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $40,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for...
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for $452,000. Birch reported a $505,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $113,000 on that date. Also, on January 1, 2013, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $112,000 when Cedar had a $104,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $28,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned...
On January 1, 2019, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $482,000....
On January 1, 2019, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company's voting stock for $482,000. Birch reported a $542,500 book value, and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $120,500 on that date. Then, on January 1, 2020, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $144,000 when Cedar had a $150,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $36,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary's excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to...
On January 1, 2016, Acorn company acquired an 80% interest in Bengal company’s voting stock for...
On January 1, 2016, Acorn company acquired an 80% interest in Bengal company’s voting stock for $288,000. On that date Bengal had a $300,000 book value and the fair value of the non-controlling interest was $72,000. On January 1, 2017, Bengal acquired 80% of Canaris Company for $104,000 when Canaris had a $100,000 book value and the value of the non-controlling interest was $26,000. In each acquisition, the excess of fair value over book value was assigned to Tradename with...
On January 1, 2016, Plymouth Corporation acquired 80 percent of the outstanding voting stock of Sander...
On January 1, 2016, Plymouth Corporation acquired 80 percent of the outstanding voting stock of Sander Company in exchange for $1,200,000 cash. At that time, although Sander’s book value was $925,000, Plymouth assessed Sander’s total business fair value at $1,500,000. Since that time, Sander has neither issued nor reacquired any shares of its own stock. The book values of Sander's individual assets and liabilities approximated their acquisition-date fair values except for the patent account, which was undervalued by $350,000. The...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT