Question

In: Accounting

Manufacturing Corp. owns a five-acre parcel of land. Its factory takes up one acre of this...

Manufacturing Corp. owns a five-acre parcel of land. Its factory takes up one acre of this land, and there is a mall on the other four acres. Manufacturing Corp. rents out retail space in the mall. To get rid of a troublemaker shareholder, Manufacturing Corp. wants to put all of the land into a subsidiary, sign a long-term lease for its own factory, and then split off this subsidiary by transferring it to the troublemaker shareholder in complete redemption of his stock. Discuss how this may or may not qualify as a divisive D reorganization followed by a sec. 355 distribution.

Solutions

Expert Solution

. D. Divisive Reorganizations

In many cases, the subsidiaries do not exist at the time the parent corporation wishes to separate its business. However, a divisive transaction can be done on a tax free basis using a corporate reorganization under Section 368(a)(s)(D), which allows the parent corporation to form a subsidiary to which the parent transfers part or all of its business as the first step in a plan to distribute the subsidiary's stock to shareholders.

For example: A Type D Reorganization in a "split off' would involve the transfer of part of the parent corporation's business to a controlled subsidiary corporation in exchange for its stock and securities followed by a distribution of that stock (and securities) to certain shareholders of the parent corporation. Handling the transaction as a D reorganization can accomplish any of the tax free divisions described in Paragraphs.. As in all types of tax free reorganizations, the judicial requirements of "business purpose", "continuity of business enterprise" and "continuity of interest" must also be met to satisfy the requirements of Section 355 whether or not accomplished through a D Reorganization.

A "split-off'

A "split-off' is a non pro-rata distribution of stock by the parent corporation of a subsidiary corporation to some of its shareholders in exchange for their stock in the parent. Example: A and B are two equal shareholders of the parent corporation. The business is divided and one part of the business is transferred to a newly formed subsidiary followed by the parent distributing the subsidiary stock to A in redemption for all of his stock in the parent corporation. A split-off resembles a redemption. If the split-off fails to qualify under Section 355, the parent corporation would be taxed under Section 311 on the fair market value (in excess of basis) of the subsidiary stock distributed in redemption of the shareholder's stock in the parent; and the shareholder receiving the subsidiary stock would be taxed under Section 302 on the redemption of his stock in the parent.

A "split-up"

A split-up is when the parent corporation divides the business and transfers it to two new subsidiary corporations which are then distributed non pro-rata to all of the shareholders in exchange for their stock in the parent corporation. A split-up resembles a complete liquidation of the parent corporation. After a split-up, the shareholders own stock interests (either pro-rata or non pro-rata) in the two new corporations and the distributing corporation ceases to exist. If the split-up fails to qualify under Section 355, the parent corporation would be taxed under Section 336 on the distribution of the subsidiaries as if it had sold the subsidiaries at fair market value, and the shareholders would be taxed under Section 331 on the receipt of the stock..


Related Solutions

Eric and Ginny are farmers. Each one owns a 12-acre plot of land. The following table...
Eric and Ginny are farmers. Each one owns a 12-acre plot of land. The following table shows the amount of corn and rye each farmer can produce per year on a given acre. Each farmer chooses whether to devote all acres to producing corn or rye or to produce corn on some of the land and rye on the rest. Corn Rye (Bushels per acre) (Bushels per acre) Eric 20 4 Ginny 28 7 On the following graph, use the...
Dagwood was the registered owner of a 5 acre parcel on which there was one registered...
Dagwood was the registered owner of a 5 acre parcel on which there was one registered mortgage to the Bank of Montreal for $250,000.00 which was registered on October 8, 2017. On September 1, 2008, Dagwood granted an easement to Robotman for a 25 foot access strip across the eastern end of Dagwood=s property. Robotman paid $5,000.00 for that easement. On February 1, 2019, Dagwood borrowed $30,000.00 from Linus and signed a mortgage to Linus that was never registered. As...
Mining Corp acquired a parcel of land for $4,000,000. It was estimated that the property contained...
Mining Corp acquired a parcel of land for $4,000,000. It was estimated that the property contained 300,000 tons of mineral reserves. Federal law requires that mined properties be restored to a natural condition after mining is completed. It is expected that restoration costs will total $400,000 and that the restored land could be resold for $200,000. During the year, the company extracted 25,000 tons (of which 15,000 tons were sold) of mineral reserves from the property. 1.try to record the...
Carlson Development owns a prime parcel of land that can be developed into a residential, commercial,...
Carlson Development owns a prime parcel of land that can be developed into a residential, commercial, or industrial complex. Carlson plans to manage each of the projects for seven years and then cash out. After considerable research, Carlson estimates that cash flows from the three alternative projects are as follows:         Cash Flows In Millions Project Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Residential (25.0) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0...
Russell Corporation sold a parcel of land valued at $517,500. Its basis in the land was...
Russell Corporation sold a parcel of land valued at $517,500. Its basis in the land was $382,950. For the land, Russell received $72,750 in cash in year 0 and a note providing that Russell will receive $265,000 in year 1 and $179,750 in year 2 from the buyer (plus reasonable interest on the note). (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest whole dollar amount.) What is Russell’s realized gain on the transaction? What is Russell’s recognized...
Matthew owns a piece of land with a toy factory on it in a small town...
Matthew owns a piece of land with a toy factory on it in a small town near Melbourne city. The factory is a family business that started a century ago and is currently used to produce handmade wooden toys. However, for market participants, they would redevelop the land to build a retail shopping centre. Matthew recently received an attractive offer from property redevelopers, but he rejected the offer because he has no intention to stop the family business. Which of...
It is estimated by experts on agriculture that one-third of an acre of land is needed...
It is estimated by experts on agriculture that one-third of an acre of land is needed to provide food for one person on a continuing basis. It is also estimated that there are 10 billion acres of arable land on earth, and that therefore a maximum population of 30 billion people can be sustained if no other sources of food are known. The total world population at the beginning of 1970 was 3.6 billion. Assuming that the population continues to...
Dorsey Co. has expanded its operations by purchasing a parcel of land with a building on...
Dorsey Co. has expanded its operations by purchasing a parcel of land with a building on it from Bibb Co. for $89,000. The appraised value of the land is $24,000, and the appraised value of the building is $102,000. information Required: a. Assuming that the building is to be used in Dorsey Co.’s business activities, what cost should be recorded for the land? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) b. Indicate why, for income tax purposes, management of Dorsey Co. would...
Sandhill Corp. purchased land with two old buildings on it as a factory site for $454,000....
Sandhill Corp. purchased land with two old buildings on it as a factory site for $454,000. The property tax assessment (that is, assessed value) on this property was $357,000: $255,000 for the land and the rest for the buildings. It took six months to tear down the old buildings and construct the factory. The company paid $62,200 to raze the old buildings and it sold salvaged copper, lumber, and brick for $6,500. Legal fees of $1,860 were paid for title...
Ivanhoe Corp. purchased land with two old buildings on it as a factory site for $454,000....
Ivanhoe Corp. purchased land with two old buildings on it as a factory site for $454,000. The property tax assessment (that is, assessed value) on this property was $356,000: $249,000 for the land and the rest for the buildings. It took six months to tear down the old buildings and construct the factory. The company paid $60,100 to raze the old buildings and sold salvaged copper, lumber, and brick for $6,700. Legal fees of $1,860 were paid for title search...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT