Question

In: Accounting

The Greek shipping company Ionia Management managed a 600-foot oil tanker that delivered oil to ports...

The Greek shipping company Ionia Management managed a 600-foot oil tanker that delivered oil to ports along the eastern seaboard of the United States. During these deliveries, Ionia's engine room crew, at the direction of their ship supervisors, regularly dumped oily waste into the ocean. To conceal the wrongdoing, the ship's crew falsified entries in its oil record book and lied to Coast Guard officials regarding the waste. The top executives and officials at Ionia did not know that employees were violating company policy and falsifying ship records to cover up their wrongdoing. A jury convicted Ionia of conspiracy, pollution, and obstruction of justice, and the company was fined $4.9 million in addition to probation and assessments. The corporation appealed. Should the corporation be found criminally liable for the illegal actions of its lower-level employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior? Why or why not? [United States v. Ionia Mgmt, 555 F.3d 303 (2009).]

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

Doctrine of respondeat superior means a case wherein the Employers are made responsible for all the acts done by the employees at the time of employment.The above is valid only if there exists a master servant relationship between employer and the employee.

Herein the Employer is Lonia Management and the ship supervisors or the ship crew are the lower level employees and thus the Employer Employee relationship exists.

Therefore in my opinion, the corporation can be found criminally liable for all the illegal actions of its employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior since those employees were related to the corporation and $4.9 million could not be recovered from them as they were representing the corporation and there was no proof or evidence that the corporation was not involved, In other case also, if the company is not held responsible then in future many such companies can commit fraud and act innocent by shifting the blame of the fraud on the Employees and not taking the responsibility for the same.

Hope this helps.

Note:- The answer is given as per my knowledge. There can be different opinions


Related Solutions

Cheyenne Company purchases an oil tanker depot on January 1, 2020, at a cost of $648,500....
Cheyenne Company purchases an oil tanker depot on January 1, 2020, at a cost of $648,500. Cheyenne expects to operate the depot for 10 years, at which time it is legally required to dismantle the depot and remove the underground storage tanks. It is estimated that it will cost $79,920 to dismantle the depot and remove the tanks at the end of the depot’s useful life. Prepare the journal entries to record the depot and the asset retirement obligation for...
Oil company is planning to issue new shares in the stock market and the management contacted...
Oil company is planning to issue new shares in the stock market and the management contacted with various investment banks. In this regard, ABC Investment bank offer oil company following options for its IPO sales of equity; A best effort arrangement where ABC will keep $2 per share for each share sold A firm commitment arrangement of $20,000,000 oil company plans to issue 2000,000 shares at $11 per share to public, please analyze; In case only 100% shares are sold,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT