In: Chemistry
Below is data that a researcher collected on the observed decay of a chemical in water as a function of time. The Researcher used an analytically technique to quantify the chemical that reports relative “peak area” or “response” values. As a result, the researcher analyzed a series of known “standards” of chemical “A” to construct a standard curve, from which the concentrations of “A” in the experimental samples could be calculated. It is known that the chemical decays by a first-order process. (always use the “xy scatter” option under graph type).
Standard Curve: |
|
[A], Concentration of A (Molarity) |
Peak Area |
0.002 |
1220 |
0.004 |
2520 |
0.006 |
3680 |
0.008 |
4940 |
0.01 |
6120 |
Experimental Data: |
|
Time (hours) |
Peak Area |
0 |
6120 |
10 |
4320 |
20 |
3060 |
30 |
2250 |
40 |
1660 |
50 |
1170 |
60 |
830 |
Data Table 1)
Find the slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient of the standard curve regressing [A] on the x-axis, and “Peak Area” on the y-axis (Use Excels built-in functions for all three parameters). Plot the data points, and on the same graph, plot the regression line (solve for values on the line on the spreadsheet, including at x=0) (Figure 1).
Useful table headings:
A(Molarity) Peak Area Line
Data Table 2)
From the standard curve and the peak areas of the samples, calculate the concentrations of “A” in each sample. Find the natural logarithm (ln) of these values. Find the slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient for the least-squares analysis of time (x-axis) versus ln([A]) (y-axis) (use the built-in functions). Using the slope and intercept, calculate points on the regression “line”. Plot the experimental values of ln[A] versus time and the regression line on a graph (Figure 2). From the regression (slope and intercept), calculate [A]t=0 and k. (note that k is always positive).
Useful headings:
time(hrs) Peak Area A(Molarity) ln(A) ln(A)calculated
Data Table 3)
Use Solver to calculate [A]t=0 and k without “transforming the data."
Useful table headings:
time(hrs) Aexpected (Molarity) Acalc (Molarity) (Aexpected - Acalculated)2
For these data, does the Solver solution agree well with the transformed (i.e., logarithmic) model results? Why or why not.
Table 4) Report the experimental data in units of miliMolar.
Useful table headings:
time(hrs) A(Molarity) A(miliMolar)
Table 5) Calculate the “model" fit at 5 hours or smaller increments, using the values of [A]t=0 and k calculated both ways, and convert to miliMolar concentrations. Plot the original data (Table 4) and the 2 model lines (solid and dashed) (Table 5) on the same plot (Figure 3).
Useful table headings:
Transformed Solver
time (hrs) A (Molarity) A(miliMolar) A(M) A(mM)
Format all Tables and Figures on 2 pages in Excel.
There are many subparts in this questions. I am answering questions for table 1 and 2 (Chegg Policy: 1 questions per post or 4 sub parts in 1 question)
ANSWER
Table 1
a) Table 1
A (mol/L) | Peak Area | Line |
0 | 30 | |
0.002 | 1220 | 1252 |
0.004 | 2520 | 2474 |
0.006 | 3680 | 3696 |
0.008 | 4940 | 4918 |
0.01 | 6120 | 6140 |
b) For the standard curve we plot Peak area (y-axis) vs. [A] (x-axis) we get
c) The regression analysis gives the following values
slope | 611000 |
intercept | 30 |
correlation coefficient | 0.9997 |
and the line equation is:
this equation is used to calculate the values in the "line" column of table 1 (calculated peak area on the regression line)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2
a) Table 2
Time (h) | Peak Area | A (mol/L) | ln (A) | ln (A) calculated |
0 | 6120 | 9.97E-03 | -4.608 | -4.617 |
10 | 4320 | 7.02E-03 | -4.959 | -4.951 |
20 | 3060 | 4.96E-03 | -5.307 | -5.286 |
30 | 2250 | 3.63E-03 | -5.618 | -5.620 |
40 | 1660 | 2.67E-03 | -5.927 | -5.954 |
50 | 1170 | 1.87E-03 | -6.284 | -6.289 |
60 | 830 | 1.31E-03 | -6.638 | -6.623 |
b) The values of A were calculated with the equation line of part 1:
c) And plotting ln (A) (y-axis) vs. Time (x-axis) we get
d) The regression analysis gives the following values
slope | -0.03343 |
intercept | -4.617 |
correlation coefficient | 0.9995 |
and the line equation is:
this equation is used to calculate the values in the "ln (A) calculated" column of table 2 (calculated ln (A) on the regression line).
e) As A decay follows a first-order process, this means that integrated rate law for A decay is
It is similar to the line equation second graph. Then, we can calculate the calues of k and [A]0: