In: Economics
The absence of a direct competitor characterizes the monopoly market; a monopoly ultimately provides the “authority” to act in any manner deemed appropriate for its welfare despite destructive or disadvantageous to the consumers. These are the common perceptions circulating among disgruntled consumers of the power distribution business in the country which affects consumers. The company with all its rights as a monopoly, has all the power to bring inconveniences to the people if ever their desire for a price increase is not approved. What are your thoughts on this?
The reasons market power becomes concentrated in the hands of a
monopolist in an industry can be brought down to one major point -
barriers to entry. These barriers to entry can be of different
types:
1) Price barrier: Monopolist's existing scale of operations is so
large that they can reap the efficiency gains from Increasing
Returns to Scale to price undercut any new competitors, driving
them out of business
2) Contractual barriers: If the firm is also a monopolistic buyer
in the input market (i.e. the sole buyer of an important input)
then the firm can prohibit its suppliers from supplying to
competitors.
3) Technological and knowledge barriers: Monopolist may have unique
knowledge or patented production technology
4) Legal barrier: The firm may be a government sanctioned monopoly
e.g. East India Company
5) Customer loyalty: Monopolist may be positioned in existing
prospect's minds as the reliable authority brand, making it
extremely difficult for new entrants to get a foot in the
door
When any of these factors come into play, the competitive drive
towards cost-cutting and quality-improvement is stifled. In other
words the detrimental effect of neglect towards proper
(competitive, price-cutting, quality-improving, efficient)
utilization of resources is passed on to consumers through
imposition of higher prices.