Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The following explanation and table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment....

The following explanation and table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment.
-Depressed people are given two different types of treatments: Exercise, and Psychological Therapy.
-Factor A is exercise, and there are 3 levels: intense exercise, moderate exercise, or no exercise.
-Factor B is therapy, and there are 2 levels: Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Treatment as Usual.
-There are n = 8 participants in each treatment condition. Use the lecture notes as your guide for this problem.
A: State the three different hypotheses for this test

B: What are the critical values for the main effect of factor A? Factor B? Interaction effect?

C: If alpha is .05, is there a significant effect for factor A, factor B, and/or the interaction of A and B?

D: If the p value associated with the finding for Factor A was .02, what would this mean about the relationship with the null distribution?

E: Fill in this table

Source SS Df MS F
Between Groups 60 -- --
Factor A: Exercise 16
Factor B: Therapy 20
AxB: Exercise X Therapy
Within(error) --
Total 150 -- --

Solutions

Expert Solution

Source SS Df MS F F critical
Between groups 60 5 --- ---
Factor A: exercise 16 2 8 3.73 3.22
Factor B: therapy 20 1 20 9.33 4.07
A x B: exercise X therapy 24 2 12 5.6 3.22
Within (error) 90 42 2.14 ---
Total 150 47 --- ---

(a) The hypothesis being tested is:

H0: There is no main effect of Factor A

Ha: There is a main effect of Factor A

The hypothesis being tested is:

H0: There is no main effect of Factor B

Ha: There is a main effect of Factor B

The hypothesis being tested is:

H0: There is no interaction effect

Ha: There is an interaction effect

(b) The critical value for the main effect of factor A is 3.22.

The critical value for the main effect of factor B is 4.07.

The critical value for the interaction effect is 3.22.

(c) There is a significant effect of factor A. (F (2, 42) = 3.73, p < 0.05)

There is a significant effect of factor B. (F (1, 42) = 9.33, p < 0.05)

There is a significant interaction effect. (F (2, 42) = 5.6, p < 0.05)

(d) The p-value is 0.02.

Since the p-value (0.02) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we can conclude that there is a significant effect of factor A.

.

i hope it helps..

If you have any doubts please comment and please don't dislike.

PLEASE GIVE ME A LIKE. ITS VERY IMPORTANT FOR ME.


Related Solutions

The following explanation and table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment....
The following explanation and table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment. Depressed people are given two different types of treatments: Exercise, and Psychological Therapy. Factor A is exercise, and there are 3 levels: intense exercise, moderate exercise, or no exercise. Factor B is therapy, and there are 2 levels: Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Treatment as Usual. There are n = 8 participants in each treatment condition State the three different hypotheses for this test. What...
The following table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment with 2...
The following table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment with 2 levels of factor A, 3 levels of factor B, and n = 6 participants in each treatment condition. A. Fill in all missing values in the table. Show your work (i.e., all computational steps for finding the missing values). Hint: start with the df values. B.  Do these data indicate any significant effects (assume p < .05 for hypothesis testing of all three effects)?            Note:...
The following table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment with 2...
The following table summarizes the results of a two-factor ANOVA evaluating an independent-measures experiment with 2 levels of factor A, 3 levels of factor B, and n = 6 participants in each treatment condition. A. Fill in all missing values in the table. Show your work (i.e., all computational steps for finding the missing values). Hint: start with the df values. B.  Do these data indicate any significant effects (assume p < .05 for hypothesis testing of all three effects)? the...
An Excel ANOVA table that summarizes the results of an experiment to assess the effects of...
An Excel ANOVA table that summarizes the results of an experiment to assess the effects of ambient noise level and plant location on worker productivity. Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Plant location 3.0075 3 1.0025 2.561 0.1199 3.862 Noise level 8.4075 3 2.8025 7.160 0.0093 3.863 Error 3.5225 9 0.3914 Total 14.9375 State the 2 null hypothesis for the F statistics listed above At the 1% significance level, do you reject or fail to reject...
The following table summarizes the results from a two-factor study with 3 levels of Factor A...
The following table summarizes the results from a two-factor study with 3 levels of Factor A and 4 levels of Factor B using a separate sample of 5 participants in each treatment condition. Fill in the missing values. Make sure to show your work. Source SS df MS F Between treatments 650 Factor A 5 0 Factor B AxB interaction 120 Within treatments 2 5 Total
The following results are from an independent-measures, two factor study. Be careful that this is a...
The following results are from an independent-measures, two factor study. Be careful that this is a 2x3 design. You are expected to extend your knowledge on 2x2 design to a 2x3 factorial design. The study: Consider an experiment designed to investigate the effectiveness of therapy for the treatment of anxiety or fear. Two kinds of therapy (systematic desensitization, counter conditioning) as well as a counseling-only control condition are included. The therapy and counseling programs have been conducted over a number...
The following partial ANOVA table was based on an experiment performed as a two-factor design with...
The following partial ANOVA table was based on an experiment performed as a two-factor design with 2 levels of factor A, 3 levels of factor B, and 5 observations on each treatment. It was determined that treatment groups were independently selected from a normal distribution with the same variance for each treatment. Source of variation df Sum of Squares Mean Square F Factor A 27 Factor B 2 32 Interaction Error 108 Total 29 227 a) Fill in the missing...
The following data were obtained from a two‑factor independent-measures experiment.                              &n
The following data were obtained from a two‑factor independent-measures experiment.                                B1             B2              A1 M = 22 T = 440 SS = 1540 M = 15 T = 300 SS = 1270     n = 20 for all cells     A2 M = 17 T = 340 SS = 1320 M = 18 T = 360 SS = 1266         G = 1440         N = 80      ΣX2 = 31,836 - Following the steps of a hypothesis test, determine if...
Question A. The below data correspond to a two-factor ANOVA. (Independent-measures) Using the following data below,...
Question A. The below data correspond to a two-factor ANOVA. (Independent-measures) Using the following data below, determine whether the data is sufficient to conclude that there was a significant difference between your conditions. Show all of your work, including all of the steps in your hypothesis test, including a summary table. State hypotheses for all 3 questions that should be asked about this dataset. Perform all calculations (must show all work to get full credit!) and construct an ANOVA table....
The following data were obtained from a two-factor independent-measures experiment with n = 5 participants in...
The following data were obtained from a two-factor independent-measures experiment with n = 5 participants in each treatment condition                         AROUSAL                                               LOW             MEDIUM           HIGH DRUG      Control      M = 3          M = 6       M = 9     Cannibis      M = 3       M = 4       M = 3       DV = Number of errors State the hypotheses for each of the three separate tests included in the two-factor ANOVA. 2) Draw a graph...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT