In: Finance
Can we really compare tax rates since the individuals rate can vary based on income level?
The Union Budget 2020 introduced a
new personal income tax regime for individual taxpayers. However,
the option for this concessional tax regime came with a cost, it
required the taxpayer to forego certain specified deductions. These
include standard deduction of Rs 50,000, deduction under section
80C of Rs 1.50 lakh and interest on self-occupied property of Rs 2
lakh, deductions which are availed by most taxpayers. As a result,
the concessional tax regime may not always be beneficial.
Based on the illustrative table below, you can clearly see that the
maximum benefit that can be availed under the new tax regime
(considering no investments are made) is Rs 75,000 in terms of tax
savings. As a result, unlike the corporate tax concessional tax
rate regime which reduces tax rates across income levels, the
concessional tax rate has limited application and will benefit
persons in the lower income brackets. The highest personal income
tax rate of 42.7 per cent will continue to be a huge challenge for
high net worth individuals (HNIs).
In the existing tax regime the basic exemption income slab in case
of a resident individual who is 60 years or more (senior citizen)
and resident individual of the age of 80 years or more (very senior
citizens) at any time during the previous year, continues to remain
the same as before at Rs 3 lakh and Rs 5 lakh, respectively. The
above table presents the comparative working for individual
taxpayers, other than senior citizens and super senior citizens,
wherein Rs 2.5 lakh is the basic exemption limit in both the tax
regimes.
The pros of the new regime are as follows:
Reduced tax rates and compliance:
The new regime provides for concessional tax rates vis-à-vis tax
rates in the existing or old regime. Further, as most of the
exemptions and deductions are not available, the documentation
required is lesser and tax filing is simpler.
Investor may not prefer to lock-in funds in the prescribed
instruments for the specified period: Under the new regime, all
taxpayers would be treated at par and benefit of
deduction/allowances would not be a criteria for availing the tax
exemption. This may be helpful for those categories of taxpayers
who may not subscribe to the specified modes of investments, as
most of the investments have a lock-in period, before which it
cannot be withdrawn. They can invest in open-ended mutual
funds/instruments/deposits, which provides them good returns as
well as flexibility of withdrawal as well. For instance, certain
eligible instruments have a longer lock-in period such as fixed
deposits with banks and post offices have a lock-in period of five
years, equity-linked savings schemes (ELSS) is for a period of
three years, National Savings Certificates (NSC) for five years,
etc.
Increased liquidity in the hands of the taxpayer: The reduced tax
rate would provide more disposable income to the taxpayer, who
could not invest in specified instruments due to certain financial
or other personal reasons.
Flexibility of customising the investment choice: The existing tax
regime provides for deductions to the taxpayer, provided he makes
investments in certain instruments and manner as prescribed in the
Act. This restricts the investment choices for the taxpayer as he
has to make the investments only in the instruments specified.
However, the new regime provides taxpayer with a flexibility of
customising their investment choices.