Question

In: Finance

IBM announced its 1982 earnings per share (EPS) for the fourth quarter of 1982 on Friday,...

IBM announced its 1982 earnings per share (EPS) for the fourth quarter of 1982 on Friday, January 21, 1983. EPS was up 28 percent from the fourth quarter of 1981. Nevertheless, IBM's stock price dropped by $3.25 to $94.625. Security analysts explained the price drop by noting that an unexpectedly large part of the increase was due to an accounting restatement required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's order FASB 52. The "true" increase in EPS was thought to be correspondingly less. On Monday, January 24, IBM's stock price dropped by $.75 more, although overall market indexes were down sharply (-2.75 percent). Later in the day, IBM issued a statement clarifying the impact of FASB 52. IBM's EPS would have been just as high under prior accounting rules (FASB 8). "'The confusion on Friday was that we didn't have enough detail,' [said] Barry Tarasoff, an analyst at Goldman, Sachs & Co. ‘WeIl, we got it today, and the fourth quarter looks fine.' On Tuesday, IBM's stock price rose by $2.125. Is this an efficient market at work? Discuss carefully.


Solutions

Expert Solution

This is not an Efficient market because when the results would have been announced, the result would have been completely priced into the stock in an efficient market, as all the privately available information and the publicly available information have already been discounted into the stock price in efficient market so in this case it should have been discounted as this was a private information and there would have been no reaction on the announcement of the results and when the impact of the accounting standards were also announced the share prices fluctuated in respect to that even though the movement was not completely recognisable but it did fluctuate in respect to market news so it can be said that this is not an Efficient market as Efficient market completely advocates for complete discounting of the price and information and there will be no descrepency between the price and the value and only new information can cause movement in the stock price and hence it can be said that this stock is not following the principles of Efficient market and this is not an Efficient market.


Related Solutions

Path to the Mountain Inc. just announced earnings per share of $6 for the current quarter...
Path to the Mountain Inc. just announced earnings per share of $6 for the current quarter (which ended today). Path to the Mountain has just paid out 20% of these earnings as a dividend and reinvested the rest in new projects earning a return of 38% per year. Path to the Mountain will continue to pay quarterly dividends under these policies and investment returns until two years from today. Two years from today and thereafter forever, the return on Path...
explain what earnings per share (EPS). How is EPS calculated and why it is important for...
explain what earnings per share (EPS). How is EPS calculated and why it is important for investors to gauge the value of a share?
A company has an EPS of US$12 per share. It pays out its entire earnings as...
A company has an EPS of US$12 per share. It pays out its entire earnings as dividend. It has a growth rate of zero and a required return on equity of 8 percent per annum. Assuming all cashflows are perpetuities, what will be the price of the company’s stock? Select one: a. USD83.43 b. USD155.00 c. USD85.00 d. USD150.00
Briefly explain what you understand by Earnings per share (EPS). How is EPS calculated and why...
Briefly explain what you understand by Earnings per share (EPS). How is EPS calculated and why it is important for investors to gauge the value of a share? Refer to the relevant web links that I have put on course website and use any other references that you like. (Your answer should not exceed 250 words) Why do firms buy back the shares from investors? What do they gain? Briefly explain the economics of such a decision and its effects...
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated using net earnings if a company follows IFRS. what are...
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated using net earnings if a company follows IFRS. what are the pros and cons of calculating EPS on comprehensive income rather than net income
Fun Toys Co. reported a per-share book value of $3.5, earnings per share (EPS) of $2.3,...
Fun Toys Co. reported a per-share book value of $3.5, earnings per share (EPS) of $2.3, and dividend per share (DPS) of 0.85 in its balance sheet on December 31, 2010. In early 2011 analysts made the following forecasts for 2011~2015: EPS growth rate is 4.5%, and DPS growth rate is 2%. The required return for equity is 8.5% percent. Case 1: If the residual earnings are zero after 2015, calculate the value per share at the end of 2010....
According to the Codification, is Earnings per Share (EPS) a required disclosure with the quarterly financial...
According to the Codification, is Earnings per Share (EPS) a required disclosure with the quarterly financial statements of a publicly-traded company? Yes or No?
Earnings per share (EPS) is a popular financial ratio. It is easily accessible to investors as...
Earnings per share (EPS) is a popular financial ratio. It is easily accessible to investors as a company gives EPS figure on its annual reports. Often, it is the first ratio that investors look at for its powerful indication of company’s profitability. Do you agree with Mr Boboboy’s concern? Discuss THREE (3) reasons on whether it is appropriate to depend only on EPS figure to value a company’s future performance.
What is earnings per share (EPS)? What does it measure?   Is it better to have a...
What is earnings per share (EPS)? What does it measure?   Is it better to have a higher or lower EPS? Why? Is it better to have a higher or lower price-earnings ratio (P-E ratio)? State your reasoning. Is a low PE ratio good and why? What would be considered a high PE ratio?
3. In the table below you can find the earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per...
3. In the table below you can find the earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share (DPS) information for General Electric (GE) and General Motors (GM). For each company, please explain whether it is appropriate to use DDM to value the stock. (3 points) Year   Company   EPS($)   DPS ($) 2001   GENERAL ELECTRIC CO   1.38   0.64 2002   GENERAL ELECTRIC CO   1.42   0.72 2003   GENERAL ELECTRIC CO   1.5   0.76 2004   GENERAL ELECTRIC CO   1.62   0.8 2005   GENERAL ELECTRIC CO   1.58   0.88...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT