In: Finance
A.
In the given case, we must look in the Parol evidence rule and collateral contract. Parol rule preserves the genuinity or integrity of a written document. This helps secure the originality of written contract. This caused unfairness on opposite parties sometimes.
There are several exception to this case. In the given case, if there is collateral agreement, ie., the agreement consist of both oral and written, it may be considered. The exception states that extrinsic evidence is permitted to show if it can be proved by both parties that the contract consist of oral and written terms.
Marcel can use this exception to sue Yvonne for damages and claims
B.
You can give answer by providing definition of the term misrepresentation and its elements. Where, by using IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application and conclusion) strategy, appliying the "Rule" which applies test to the issue.
Misrepresentaiton refers to action of giving false or misleading account of nature of something. In the given case, the tyre hasn't been replaced and hence given false statement. The rule of general principle apply as per IRAC, it is clearly shown that the party cannot prove his negligence and hence can be sued for misrepresentation.