In: Finance
You are working at a bank, and after analyzing the $295 million portfolio of debt securities, you have determined a portfolio duration of 3.65, and an average Yield to Maturity of 5.65%. If you believe interest rates will be increasing by 0.75%, what is your expected change in portfolio value? If on the other hand, the prevailing wisdom is that rates will drop by 0.25%, what is the expect change in portfolio value? Briefly, what is wrong with this type of analysis? Additionally, what would be wrong with regulators coming in and asking you to repeat this analysis for an increase in interest rates of 3%?
Portfolio Value | $ 295,000,000 | ||
Portfolio Duration = | 3.65 | ||
YTM = | 5.65% | ||
Modified Duration= Portfolio Duration /(1+YTM) | |||
So Modified Duration=3.65/(1+0.0565)=3.45. | |||
As we know for every % change in Interest rate | |||
there will be Modified Duration*same % change in price in the opposite direction. | |||
A | |||
Interest rate change | % Change in Porfoilio Price=-Modified Duration *% nterest change | Amount of Porfolio Price change =$295M*A | |
Increase by 0.75% | -2.59% | $ (7,633,125) | |
Drop by 0.25% | 0.86% | $ 2,544,375 | |
The issue with such analysis is that in case od sharp increase or decrease | |||
in interest rate, the process will overestimate or underestimate the | |||
corresponding change in price. | |||
Therefore the analysis can throw some projections which may give | |||
wrong forecasts and may create confusions. | |||
Market regulators may have objections in such cases as the projections | |||
can be quite misleading. Generally the convexity parameter is | |||
considered to avoid such issues. |