Question

In: Economics

5. Solve for Nash Equilibrium in the following 3 Player Game Player 3: Chooses Enter Player...

5. Solve for Nash Equilibrium in the following 3 Player Game

Player 3: Chooses Enter

Player 2
High Low
Player 1 Low 2,0,4 1,1,1
Medium 3,2,3 0,1,0
High 1,0,2 0,0,3

Player 3: Chooses Opt Out

Player 2
Player 1 High Low
Low 2,0,3 4,1,2
Medium 1,3,2 2,2,2
High 0,0,0 3,0,3

Solutions

Expert Solution

Here, in this given game the first entries are of Player 3.

Hence, when Player 3 chooses to enter the game, then the game as is follows:

If player 3 chooses high (as 4>1) the best response for Player 1 is Low (2>1) and Player 2 is high (as 1>0). So, no Nash Equilibrium in this row

In the second row, when player 3 chooses high (as 3>0), player 1 chooses high as 3>2 and the best response for Player 2 is also high (as 2>1) and thus, there's Nash equilibrium in this row i.e 3,2,3

In the third row, when player 3 chooses low (as 3>2), player 1 chooses High (as 1>0) and player 2 is indifferent as both payoffs are same hence no Nash Equilibrium

Player 3: Chooses Enter

Player 2
High Low
Player 1 Low 2,0,4 1,1,1
Medium 3,2,3 0,1,0
High 1,0,2 0,0,3

Thus, the Nash equilibrium in this case when the Player 3 chooses to enter the game is 3,2,3

Now Similarly when Player 3 chooses to opt out from the game, then the game is as follows:

If Player 3 chooses from first row, he opts for high (3) as it is greater than low (2), but player 1 will choose low(4) as his payoff is greater than high and player 2 will also choose low(1) as his payoff will be greater than high(0). Hence, no Nash equlibrium in the first row

Now if Player 3 chooses from second row, he is indifferent between playing high and low as the payoff for both is same i.e. 2, Player 1 chooses low (as 2>1) and player 2 chooses high (as 3>2). Thus, no Nash equilibrium in this row

Similarly, for the third row player 3 chooses low as 3>0 , Player 1 chooses Low as again 3>0 and player 2 is indifferent between High and Low as both payoffs are 0.

The Nash Equlibrium in this case is undetermined even though player 1 and player 3 choose the same strategy this is beacuse player 2 is indifferent about choosing High and Low. Hence the equlibrium is not certain.

Player 3: Chooses Opt Out

Player 2
Player 1 High Low
Low 2,0,3 4,1,2
Medium 1,3,2 2,2,2
High 0,0,0 3,0,3

Hence, the only Nash Equilibrium in this game is 3,2,3 when player 3 chooses to play.


Related Solutions

What is/are the Nash Equilibrium(s) in this game?
Consider the following matrixFirm AFirm BLow PriceHigh PriceLow Price5, 56, 3High Price3, 67, 7What is/are the Nash Equilibrium(s) in this game?Group of answer choices(5,5) only.(7,7) only.both (5,5) and (7,7).There are no Nash equilibriums in this game.
briefly explain the 3 elements that form a perfect bayes-nash equilibrium for a signaling game
briefly explain the 3 elements that form a perfect bayes-nash equilibrium for a signaling game
A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing...
A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing the best strategy they can, given the choices being made by all the other players. B. a strategy which is always inferior for a player to choose, regardless of what other players do. C. an outcome in which all players experience their best possible collective outcome. D. an outcome in which a player receives his/her best possible individual payoff. The prisoners’ dilemma game A....
Consider the following game between player 1, who chooses among strategies U, M, and D, and...
Consider the following game between player 1, who chooses among strategies U, M, and D, and player 2, who chooses among strategies A, B, and C. The most reasonable prediction in this game is what? (Show your steps) A B C U 10, 5 5, 5 8, 6 M 8, 7 5, 8 6, 5 D 5, 10 9, 6 7, 7
True or False: In any Nash equilibrium, if a player is paying two (or more) strategies...
True or False: In any Nash equilibrium, if a player is paying two (or more) strategies with positive probability, then she is indifferent between any of those strategies. (provide examples)
Can a player play a weakly dominated action at a Nash equilibrium? If yes, give an...
Can a player play a weakly dominated action at a Nash equilibrium? If yes, give an example. If no, explain why.
In a strategic game, a Nash equilibrium is Group of answer choices a set of strategies...
In a strategic game, a Nash equilibrium is Group of answer choices a set of strategies (one for each player) that lead to the lowest total payoffs (summed across all players). a set of strategies (one for each player) that are mutual best responses to the other players' strategies. a strategy that mixes equally between all of the different available options. a strategy that gives a higher payoff than any other strategy, no matter what others choose.
In Chapter 1 the Nash Equilibrium in the Assurance Game illustrate the possibility of a “poverty...
In Chapter 1 the Nash Equilibrium in the Assurance Game illustrate the possibility of a “poverty trap" for the farmers of Palanpur, India. Evaluate if the following statement is True or False & Explain why. a. History and “path dependence" have a role to play in determining which equilibrium players end up in.
write an essay about Game Theory, types of games and the Nash Equilibrium?
write an essay about Game Theory, types of games and the Nash Equilibrium?
Can we say that If a game has a unique nash equilibrium, it is also a...
Can we say that If a game has a unique nash equilibrium, it is also a dominant strategy equilibrium. How can we prove this statement? This is just a statement. we should find whether it is true or not by making proof.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT