In: Statistics and Probability
David Marciano
Smokers |
Nonsmokers |
n1= 100 |
n2 = 100 |
1 = 86 bpm |
2= 83 bpm |
S1=4.8 bpm |
S2=5.3 bpm |
1 H0:___ Ha:_____ 5.Decision:{Circle one}Reject H0 or Fail to Reject H0
2 α=______ 6. P-value _________
3 Critical Value _________ 7.Statement:___________________________________
___________________________________
4Test stat______
Given sample means are,
X1 = 86
X2 = 83
Given sample standard deviations are,
s2=4.8
s2=5.3
sample sizes are
n1=100
n2=100.
(1) Null and Alternative Hypothesis
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
Ho: μ1 = μ2
Ha: μ1 > μ2
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a t-test wiil be performed.
Testing for Equality of Variances
A F-test is used to test for the equality of variances.
H0 : s12 = s22
Ha : s12 ≠ s22
The critical values are
Fl=0.673 using Excel formula =F.INV(0.025,99,99)
Fu=1.486, using Excel formula =F.INV(0.975,99,99)
So rejection region will be F<0.673 and F>1.486.
The following F-ratio is obtained:
and since F = 0.82, then the null hypothesis of equal variances is not rejected.
(2) Rejection Region
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, and the degrees of freedom are df = 198. In fact, the degrees of freedom are computed as follows, assuming that the population variances are equal as we have calculated above from F test
Hence, it is found that the critical value for this right-tailed test is tc=1.653 using Excel formula =T.INV(0.95,198)
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is R = >1.653
(3) Test Statistics
Since it is assumed that the population variances are equal, the t-statistic is computed as follows:
test stat = t = 0.83
(4) Decision about the null hypothesis
Since it is observed that t = 0.83 <tc=1.653, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is p = 0.2038, using Excel formula =T.DIST.RT(0.83,198) and since p = 0.2038 >0.05, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
(5) Conclusion
It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1(smokers) is greater than μ2 (non smokers), at the 0.05 significance level.
Note- I have highlighted answer in above explaination .