In: Finance
Your mini-case report should show and explain your calculations of component costs of capital, capital structure weights and WACC for Sea Shore Salt.
It should address the following questions:
1. What if Mr. Brinepool’s cost of equity was wrong?
2.Was there some other way to estimate the cost of equity as a check on the CAPM calculation?
3. Could there be other errors in his calculations, i.e. costs of debt, cost of preferred stock, capital structure weights?
For every step of your calculations, justify why all the component cost and component weight estimates used in your approach are correct.
MINICASE DETAILS: SEA SHORE SALT
Bernice Mountaindog was glad to be back at Sea Shore Salt. Employees were treated well. When she had asked a year ago for a leave of absence to complete her degree in finance, top management promptly agreed. When she returned with an honors degree, she was promoted from administrative assistant (she had been secretary to Joe-Bob Brinepool, the president) to treasury analyst.
Bernice thought the company’s prospects were good. Sure, table salt was a mature business, but Sea Shore Salt had grown steadily at the expense of its less well known competitors. The company’s brand name was an important advantage, despite the difficulty most customers had in pronouncing it rapidly.
Bernice started work on January 2, 2016. The first 2 weeks went smoothly. Then Mr. Brinepool’s cost of capital memo (see Figure 13.2) assigned her to explain Sea Shore Salt’s weighted-average cost of capital to other managers. The memo came as a surprise to Bernice, so she stayed late to prepare for the questions that would surely come the next day.
Bernice first examined Sea Shore Salt’s most recent balance sheet, summarized in Table 13.6. Then she jotted down the following additional points:
Figure 12-2 MEMO START
DATE: January 15, 2003
TO: S.S.S. Management
FROM: Joe-Bob Brinepool, President
SUBJECT: Cost of Capital
This memo states and clarifies our company’s long-standing policy
regarding hurdle rates for capital investment decisions. There have
been many recent questions, and some evident confusion, on this
matter. Sea Shore Salt evaluates replacement and expansion
investments by discounted cash flow. The discount or hurdle rate is
the company’s after-tax weighted-average cost of capital.
The weighted-average cost of capital is simply a blend of the rates
of return expected by investors in our company. These investors
include banks, bond holders, and preferred stock investors in
addition to common stockholders. Of course many of you are, or soon
will be, stockholders of our company. The following table
summarizes the composition of Sea Shore Salt’s financing.
Amount- Percent- Rate of Return
Bank Loan 120 20% 8%
Bond Issue 80 13.3% 7.75%
Pref. Stock 100 16.7% 6
Common Stock 300 50 16
Total 600 100%
The rates of return on the bank loan and bond issue are of course
just the interest rates we pay. However, interest is
tax-deductible, so the after-tax interest rates are lower than
shown above. For example, the after-tax cost of our bank financing,
given our 35% tax rate, is 8(1 – .35) = 5.2%. The rate of return on
preferred stock is 6%. Sea Shore Salt pays a $6 dividend on each
$100 preferred share.
Our target rate of return on equity has been 16% for many years. I
know that some newcomers think this target is too high for the safe
and mature salt business. But we must all aspire to superior
profitability.
Once this background is absorbed, the calculation of Sea Shore
Salt’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is elementary:
WACC = 8(1 – .35)(.20) + 7.75(1 – .35)(.133) + 6(.167) + 16(.50) =
10.7%
The official corporate hurdle rate is therefore 10.7%.
If you have further questions about these calculations, please
direct them to our new Treasury Analyst, Ms. Bernice Mountaindog.
It is a pleasure to have Bernice back at Sea Shore Salt after a
year’s leave of absence to complete her degree in finance.
END MEMO
table 13.6
Assets | Liabilities and Net Worth | ||
Working capital | $200 | Bank loan | $120 |
Plant and equipment | 360 | Long-term debt | 80 |
Other assets | 40 | Preferred stock | 100 |
Common stock, including retained earnings | 300 | ||
Total | $600 | Total | $600 |
Sustainable growth rate = 4/30 x .5 = 0.067 or 6.7%
Sea Shore Salt’s beta had averaged about .5, which made sense, Bernice thought, for a stable, steady-growth business. She made a quick cost of equity calculation by using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). With current interest rates of about 7%, and a market risk premium of 7%,
CAPM cost of equity = 7% +.5(7%)=10.5%
This cost of equity was significantly less than the 16% decreed in Mr. Brinepool’s memo.
1.Cost of Equity: If the cost of equity calculated by Brinepool is wrong, the WACC will be much lower.CAPM cost of Equity =10.7%.
WACC should be :
WACC= 8(1 – .35)(.20) + 7.75(1 – .35)(.133) + 6(.167) + 10.7(.50) = 8.06%
2. We can also fid the cost of equity by Dividend Discount Model(DDM)
Share Price =P0=$40
Next year dividend per share =D1=$2
Dividend growth rate=g=6.7%=0.067
Cost of Equity =Required Return =(D1/P0)+g=(2/40)+0.067=0.117=11.7%
This is 1% higher than Cost of equity as per CAPM
3.There is error in cost of preferred stock
Dividend per share =$6
Market value per share =$70
Cost of preference shares=6/70=8.57%
There is also error in weights:
Weights should be as per market value
Market Value of Bank Loan =$120
Long Term Debt =$80
Preferred stock=$70
Common Stock=$40*10=$400
Total Market Value of capital=(120+80+70+400)=670
Weight of Bank Loan=120/670=0.1791
Weight of Long term debt=80/670=0.1194
Weight of Preferred stock=70/670=0.1045
Weight of Common stock=400/670=0.5970
WACC=8(1 – .35)(0.1791)+ 7.75(1 – .35)(.1194) + 8.57(.1045) + 11.7(0.5970)=9.41%
The correct hurdle rate should be =9.41%