In: Accounting
Sharon Gallagher (audit manager), Josh Thomas (audit senior), and Suzie Pickering (audit staff) are discussing the audit of revenues for Cloud 9. They are finalizing their plans for substantive tests. They plan to send positive confirmations at two months prior to yearend, and they will use a service that allows for electronic submission of confirmations by customers.
The book value of gross accounts receivable is $71,622,804.
After discussion, the audit team sets tolerable misstatement at $3,000,000 and decide on a sample size of a 100 accounts to confirm
The audit team selects a sample with a total book value of $4,300,000 and perform the confirmation procedures.
You may assume that except for the instances noted below, you received confirmations from customers that showed no exceptions.
|
__________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Check or circle the correct answer
Fairly Stated
Misstated
Audit of Revenue for Cloud 9
Determination of amount of misstatement
The audit team has set a tolerable misstatement at $30,00,000. Tolerable misstatement is the limit set by auditors, below which any deviation from correct value of account balances or statements would not be considered as material misstatement of financial reports. The impact of misstatement has to be considered cumulatively to assess if the same is below or above tolerable limits since though individually a deviation found in a particular line item may be tolerable but total of such instances specially in case of a specifically conspired case of fraud may lead to material misstatement of financial reports.
Assessing each case of customer's balance deviation is discussed below:-
Customer No. | Particulars | Correction Entry to Misstated Accounts | Amount of misstatement (Amount in $) | Impact of profit/(loss) |
00030 | Credit memo issued on January 7,2023 provide further information and substantiate the over invoicing of stock item number 11205 by $ 18,000. Hence this would amount to misstatement. |
Sales A/c (Debit) To Customer No. 00030's A/c (credit) |
18,000 | (18,000) |
00158 | Since the goods were sold F.O.B. shipping point they were buyer's responsibility once they left the seller's warehouse. On 31st December 2022, since the goods left from Cloud 9's warehouse the receivable was correctly recorded. (Assuming that the entire difference of $ 2,00,000 is due to this reason.) | - | 0 | 0 |
00651 | Since the check was not received by Cloud 9 as at 31st December 2022, it was rightly not recorded in books of Accounts. | - | 0 | 0 |
00850 | The given instance indicates misstatement due to error of invoicing. Hence this should be corrected in the financial reports. |
Customer No. 00580's A/c (Debit) To Customer No. 00850's A/c(credit) |
35,700 | 0 |
10141 |
Though no response was received from customer following additional checks have substantiated balance as on 31st December 2022:
|
- | 0 | 0 |
21287 | Issuance of credit memo of $755 by Cloud 9 in the month of January further substantiates the trade discount not recorded on 31st December 2022. Hence this can be considered as misstatement. |
Sales A/c (Debit) To customer No. 21287's A/c (credit) |
755 | (755) |
Total misstatement | 54,455 | (18,755) |
Projected total misstatement = (54,455/43,00,000)*71,622,804 = $ 9,07,028 (approx.)
[Calculated as per ratio method of findings of sample testing (misstatement of $ 54,455) on sample value of $ 43,00,000 as against population value of $ 71,622,804]
Since the projected total misstatement is below the tolerable level of $ 30,00,000 as set by the auditors the accounts receivable can be said to be presented fairly as at December 31st, 2022.