In: Psychology
philosophy class
Question 110 pts
Spooner explicitly says that the Constitution has no authority.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 210 pts
Schultz cites the writings of the Framers in his article. He does this to support his interpretation of the Constitution and thus his conclusion. This means his citations to those writings are evidence in his argument.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 310 pts
A Textualist says that the meaning of a text is set by the intentions of the author(s)s.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 410 pts
If a smart reader thinks a text should be read a certain way, an Originalist must think that reading is correct.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 510 pts
If there are statements about the world in the Constitution, then there are propositions in the Constitution.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 610 pts
If Schultz's argument is valid and his premises are true, his argument is sound.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 710 pts
A textualist is most likely to say that if the Constitution does not say something, it does not mean that thing.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 810 pts
An Originalist is most likely to hold that if a certain word is not in the Constitution, the Constitution says nothing about that word.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 910 pts
Spooner argues that the Constitution has been useful and it thus has authority over the citizens.
True |
False |
Flag this Question
Question 1010 pts
The following is a correct application of modus tollens.
1. If the Founders wanted to bind their posterity, they violated the rights of their posterity.
2. The Founders did not violate the rights of their posterity.
3. Thus, the Founders did not want to bind their posterity.
True |
False |
Q 110
Q210
Q310
Q410
Q510
Q610
Q710
Q810
Q910
Q1010