In: Economics
Chapter 20
Scenario - Suppose that a society is made up of five families whose incomes are as follows:
$120,000; $90,000; $30,000; $30,000; and $18,000.
The federal government is considering two potential income tax plans:
Plan A is a negative income tax plan where the taxes owed equal 1/3 of income minus $20,000.
Plan B is a two-tiered plan where families earning less than $35,000 pay no income tax and families earning more than $35,000 pay 10% of their income in taxes. The income tax revenue collected from those families earning over
$35,000 is then redistributed equally to those families earning less than $35,000.
Assuming that utility is directly proportional to the cash value of after-tax income, which government policy would an advocate of utilitarianism prefer?
Assuming that utility is directly proportional to the cash value of after-tax income, which government policy would an advocate of liberalism prefer?
Assuming that utility is directly proportional to the cash value of after-tax income, which government policy would an advocate of libertarianism prefer?
Plan A:
Family 1- 120000/3 - 20000 = 20000
Family 2- 30000 - 20000 = 10000
Famiy 3- 10000- 20000 = -10000
Family 4- 10000 - 20000 = -10000
Family 5- 6000 - 20000 = -14000
Total = - 4000
Plan B:
Family 1- 120000*10% = 12000
Family 2- 90000*10% = 9000
Famiy 3- No tax
Family 4- No tax
Family 5- No Tax
12000 + 9000 = 21000 is equally distributed to reamaining three families i.e 7000 to each family.
Utilitarianism: It is a theory which promotes overall happiness and do not cause unhappiness or harm. It aims for the betterment of the society.
Liberalism: In this, the decisions are taken by the individual instead of institutions or organizations. Liberals tend to oppose government intervention in the free market.
Libertarians try to get maximize political freedom. They value individual freedom.
a.) Plan A
b.) Plan A
c.) neither Plan A nor Plan B because any plan that forcibly
redistributes income is against the philosophy.