In: Operations Management
Answer a- Agency theory could be a principle that's accustomed justify and resolve problems within the relationship between business principals and their agents. most typically, that relationship is that the one between shareholders, as principals, and company executives, as agents.
An agency, in broad terms, is any relationship between 2 parties
during which one, the agent, represents the opposite, the
principal, in every day transactions. The principal or principals
have employed the agent to perform a service on their behalf.
Principals delegate decision-making authority to agents. as a
result of many choices that have an effect on the principal
financially area unit created by the agent, variations of opinion,
and even variations in priorities and interests, can arise. Agency
theory assumes that the interests of a principal Associate in
Nursingd an agent aren't continually in alignment. this can be
generally stated because the principal-agent downside.
Financial planners and portfolio managers area unit agents on
behalf of their principals and area unit given responsibility for
the principals' assets. A renter could also be to blame of
protective and safeguarding assets that don't belong to them.
despite the fact that the renter is tasked with the work of taking
care of the assets, the renter has less interest in protective the
products than the particular homeowners.
Findings from structure behavior analysis area unit utilized by
executives and human relations professionals to raised perceive a
business’s culture, however that culture helps or hinders
productivity and worker retention, and the way to guage candidates'
skills and temperament throughout the hiring method.
Organizational behavior theories inform real-world analysis and management of teams of individuals. There area unit variety of components:
Personality plays an outsized role within the method someone
interacts with teams and produces work. Understanding a candidate's
temperament, either through tests or through speech communication,
helps confirm whether or not they area unit an honest suited a
company.
Leadership, what it's like and wherever it comes from, could be a
wealthy topic of dialogue and study inside the sphere of structure
behavior. Leadership is broad, focused, centralized or
de-centralized, decision-oriented, intrinsic during a person’s
temperament, or just a results of a foothold of authority.
Power, authority, and politics all operate inter-dependently during
a geographic point. Understanding the suitable ways in which these
components area unit exhibited and used, as prearranged by
geographic point rules and moral pointers, area unit key parts to
running a cohesive business.
Answer b : Fairness Perceptions and Satisfaction with elements
of Pay satisfactionAlthough the perception of fairness is very
important to all or any human resource selections and processes
it's significantly vital to compensation selections, like pay, pay
raises and edges. Indeed, perceived fairness of compensation, the
procedures accustomed create compensation-related selections, and
also the manner during which compensation-related info is
communicated play associate integral role in shaping reactions to
crucial parts of the compensation system. Yet, the literatures on
attitudinal reactions relating compensation and fairness
perceptions have evolved severally. despite the fact that most
would promptly acknowledge that fairness is very important to
compensation selections, analysis examining however fairness
perceptions relate to reactions to elements of pay is comparatively
scarce. Pay and satisfaction with pay is of nice importance to
workers and to organizations . Pay satisfaction may be a flat
construct. Pay level refers to the individual’s current direct
compensation in terms of wages and remuneration. Raises talk to
modification in pay level. edges mirror indirect pay to the
individual within the kind of health, retirement and payment for
time not worked, and different non-financial returns. Pay structure
and administration refers to the graded relationships created among
pay rates for various jobs among the organization and procedures by
that the pay system is run. incorporation of structure justice into
the study of pay satisfaction though many researchers have
speculated regarding the relations between justice perceptions and
pay satisfaction the role of justice constructs as antecedents or
consequences of pay satisfaction has not been clearly delineated .
However, the preponderance of analysis on pay satisfaction has
centered on pay level satisfaction to the exclusion of satisfaction
with the opposite dimensions of pay satisfaction: satisfaction with
edges, satisfaction with raises, and satisfaction with structure
and administration. Consequently, a recent meta-analysis of pay
satisfaction. was restricted to only 1 dimension of pay
satisfaction, satisfaction with pay level. additionally, previous
analysis has connected one or 2 dimensions of justice perceptions,
however not all four, to 1 or 2 dimensions of pay satisfaction to
the exclusion of different dimensions. analysis has shown the four
dimensions of pay satisfaction square measure correlate with one
another Therefore, Williams et al cautioned that tests of models
together with only 1 or 2, however not all dimensions of pay
satisfaction could be misspecified and consequently, their results
suspect. as a result of the four justice dimensions also are
correlate with one another (Colquitt et al., 2001), constant
criticism is applicable to studies that examined relationships
between justice constructs and pay satisfaction however didn't
embrace all four dimensions of justice. Against this background,
our study makes a vital contribution because it enclosed all four
dimensions of justice perceptions and every one four dimensions of
pay satisfaction. Specifically, this can be the primary study to
look at the connection between the four types of justice
perceptions, specifically distributive justice, procedural justice,
social justice and informational justice and also the four
dimensions of pay satisfaction, specifically satisfaction with pay
level, benefits, raises, and structure
5and administration. additionally, it responds to needs additional
primary studies linking interactive justice perceptions to pay
satisfaction (Williams et al., 2006, p. 406). The article is
organized as follows. First, a quick summary of the various types
of fairness perceptions is bestowed. Second, relevant analysis on
fairness and elements of the pay system square measure integrated
to develop specific, so far untested, hypotheses. Third, results of
a study conducted to check these hypotheses square measure
mentioned. Lastly, implications of results for practitioners square
measure mentioned and directions for future analysis square measure
offered.