In: Finance
1: Gross lease with base rent of $16 psf each year | ||||||||||||||
Annual cost to the tenant | $64,000 | (4000*16) | ||||||||||||
2: Gross lease with base rent of $15 psf with rent rising by $0.50 psf every other year; the first year of adjustment is year 3. | ||||||||||||||
Present Value (PV) of Cash Flow: | ||||||||||||||
(Cash Flow)/((1+i)^N) | ||||||||||||||
i=Discount Rate=12%=0.12 | ||||||||||||||
N=Year of Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||
cost for tenant in the first year | $60,000 | (15*4000) | ||||||||||||
cost in the third year | $62,000 | (15+0.5)*4000 | ||||||||||||
cost in the year 5 | $64,000 | (15.5+0.5)*4000 | ||||||||||||
cost in the year 7 | $66,000 | (16+0.5)*4000 | ||||||||||||
cost in the year 9 | $68,000 | (16.5+0.5)*4000 | ||||||||||||
N | Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||
A | Annual cost to the tenant | $60,000 | $60,000 | $62,000 | $62,000 | $64,000 | $64,000 | $66,000 | $66,000 | $68,000 | $68,000 | SUM | ||
B=A/(1.12^N) | Present Value of annual cost | $53,571 | $47,832 | $44,130 | $39,402 | $36,315 | $32,424 | $29,855 | $26,656 | $24,521 | $21,894 | $356,602 | ||
Present Value of total cost | $356,602 | |||||||||||||
Equvalant Annual Cost to the tenant | $63,113 | (Using PMT function of excelwithRate=12%, Nper=10, PV=-356602) | ||||||||||||
Absolutely net lease with base rent of $12 psf, increasing to $14 psf starting in year 6. | ||||||||||||||
Annual Lease in year 1to5 | $48,000 | (12*4000) | ||||||||||||
Annual Lease in year 6to10 | $56,000 | (14*4000) | ||||||||||||
Annualexpense in year 1 | $10,000 | (2.5*4000) | ||||||||||||
Annualexpense in year 2 | $10,300 | (10000*1.03) | ||||||||||||
Annualexpense year (N+1)=1.03*Annual expense year (N) | ||||||||||||||
N | Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||
A | Annual Lease to the tenant | $48,000 | $48,000 | $48,000 | $48,000 | $48,000 | $56,000 | $56,000 | $56,000 | $56,000 | $56,000 | |||
B | Annual expenses for tenant | $10,000 | $10,300 | $10,609 | $10,927 | $11,255 | $11,593 | $11,941 | $12,299 | $12,668 | $13,048 | |||
C=A+B | Annual Cost to the tenant | $58,000 | $58,300 | $58,609 | $58,927 | $59,255 | $67,593 | $67,941 | $68,299 | $68,668 | $69,048 | SUM | ||
D=C/(1.12^N) | Present Value of annual cost | $51,786 | $46,476 | $41,717 | $37,449 | $33,623 | $34,245 | $30,733 | $27,585 | $24,762 | $22,232 | $350,607 | ||
Present Value of total cost | $350,607 | |||||||||||||
Equvalant Annual Cost to the tenant | $62,052 | (Using PMT function of exce lwith Rate=12%, Nper=10, PV=-350607) | ||||||||||||
Tenant's Effective Rent for alternative 1 | $64,000 | |||||||||||||
Tenant's Effective Rent for alternative 2 | $63,113 | |||||||||||||
Tenant's Effective Rent for alternative 3 | $62,052 | |||||||||||||
Alternative 1 has least Risk | ||||||||||||||
Alternative 2 has Risk higher than 1 | ||||||||||||||
Alternative 3 has highest Risk | ||||||||||||||
Risk due to change in inflation rate | ||||||||||||||
Better to Choose Alternative 1 | ||||||||||||||
Considering risk and low difference in effective cost | ||||||||||||||