In: Nursing
”Socioeconomic inequalities in low birth weight are larger in the US than in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, and income inequality is on the rise globally, with the United States leading the way.” Why is this? Why is the US leading the way in disparities? Is our healthcare system to blame?
Answer:
Explanation: 1. It's main cause is that the other countries applying and introducing more liberal safety measures for their society and peoples as well as for their health care system.
2. A clear ranked federation between income fifth and low birth weight (lbw) was revealed in the USA. The feasible secrecy in the United Kingdom come forth to be between low, middle, and high incomes, and the speciality in Canada and Australia come forth to be between mothers in the lowest income fifth and higher-income mothers.
3. A few studies have conformed income swings in parent-reported child health level in the USA with those in the UK, Canada, or Australia, but the aim of those studies was not to document cross-country proportions.
4. Low birth weight (lbw) is an essential fortune teller of health and socioeconomic levels over the life course and thenceforth offsprings. In the USA, there is apparent proof of a socioeconomic ascent in LBW, although models switch by caste or ethnicity. Slight is known about the shape or size of socioeconomic ascents in health at birth in other evolved countries.
5. Yes, United State's health care system is directly responsible for increased low birth weight (LBW) rate in the country because they need to give more attention towards nation's health problems or issues in order to modify and update the health care policies for the welfare and betterment of the population of the country.
6. Our health minister must see to other countries health care policies like; Australia, Canada and United Kingdom in order to establish a better health care system as well as to reduce the low birth weight (LBW) rate in the country.
Thank You