Jonathan owns a shoe factory that produces flashy shoes, but
he pays his workers the bare minimum wage so that he can live
large. The workers at his factory, led by Cosku, have formed a
union, and are threatening to go on strike unless they receive a
higher wage so that they can reasonably support their families.
Five years ago, when Jonathan hired most of the workers,
unemployment was very high. Now, unemployment is very low. This has
changed the relative bargaining power of the employers and the
employees, which Cosku and Jonathan remember from when they took
ECON 104. Which statement most accurately describes how their
relative power now may affect the campaign for higher wages?
Select one:
a. Jonathan - the factory owner - has more bargaining power
than before, because he knows they will be very grateful to him for
hiring them when unemployment was high. He thinks he won't have to
pay workers more.
b. Cosku and the workers have higher bargaining power, because
they are less replaceable due to unemployment. There are very few
people who Jonathan can hire to replace the workers, and if there
are no workers, Jonathan cannot continue to live large. Thus, the
power dynamics of the situation favor the workers winning higher
wages.
c. Both parties are in a better position. If Jonathan gives
workers a higher wage, it will cause inflation, and then he can
charge more for the flashy shoes from his factory. Workers will
make more, and so will Jonathan.
d. Cosku and the workers are in a worse position because they
already make minimum wage. The government will see their protests
and think that it's silly, because they are already paid a legal
wage.