Question

In: Nursing

Selecting Babies (TimesOnline)—A British couple have won the right to test embryos for a gene that...

Selecting Babies (TimesOnline)—A British couple have won the right to test embryos for a gene that leads to high cholesterol levels and an increased risk of heart attacks, The Times has learnt. The decision by the fertility watchdog will reopen controversy over the ethics of designer babies, as it allows doctors to screen embryos for a condition that is treatable with drugs and can be influenced by lifestyle as well as genes. While the procedure is designed to detect a rare version of a disease called familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), which often kills children before puberty, it will also identify a milder form that can be controlled by drugs and diet. Critics argue that the test will allow couples to destroy embryos that would have had a good chance of becoming children with fulfilling and reasonably healthy lives. The test will also create an unprecedented moral dilemma for some couples, as it could show that they have produced no embryos completely unaffected by the disease. This would force them to decide whether to implant embryos that they know have a genetic risk of premature heart disease and death, or to throw them away and deny them a chance of life. Britain’s first licence to test embryos for FH will be awarded next week to Paul Serhal, of University College Hospital in London, by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Its decision breaks new ground because it permits Mr. Serhal to screen out not only the severe form of the condition but also the milder type, which is usually treatable. Embryo screening has previously been approved only for disorders in which a gene invariably causes a serious disease, or for conditions such as breast cancer in which mutations carry an 80 per cent lifetime risk. FH occurs in two forms. The more common version, heterozygous FH, affects 1 in 500 people. It is caused by a single mutated gene, which raises cholesterol and thus the risk of hardened arteries, heart disease, and stroke. It can usually be managed with statin drugs and diet. One in 250,000 people inherits two defective copies of the gene and develops homozygous FH, which is much more serious. Sufferers show severely elevated cholesterol from the age of 5, and can suffer angina by 6 or 7. Many die in childhood, and most have suffered at least one heart attack by the end of their twenties. Mr. Serhal’s patients, who are in their thirties, both have the milder heterozygous FH. They discovered their status only when they had a daughter, now 5, with the homozygous form, and they also have an unaffected son. They said yesterday that they were delighted. “We had no idea that we both carried a gene for high cholesterol until the double gene was expressed in our first child. We are very lucky that our child has responded so well to the very high-dose drug regime. We have been led to understand that other children with the same double gene may not be so lucky.” . . . Mr. Serhal said: “This obnoxious disease can cause cardiovascular accidents at a very young age. Ideally, we will find embryos with no FH genes, but it is possible we will not and it will be up to the patients to choose. Some people would think twice about using embryos that they know have a risky gene, and others would say you shouldn’t screen out a condition that can be managed so people can live with it. It will be an awkward choice.”*

Write 5 paragraphs, need help explaining

Is it wrong for parents to screen out embryos with disorders that are treatable? What about embryos that will probably—not certainly—develop a serious disease? Or those that will develop a fatal disease only in middle age? Is it morally permissible to cause to exist persons who are severely disabled and likely to suffer horribly throughout their lives? Give reasons for your answer.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) No, it is not wrong for the Patient to screening out of embryo for treatable disorder because it helps to determine the affected embryo and probable treatment for the embryo. But screening of embryo also increase parents anxiety.

2) If parents want, the embryo should be transplanted to the mother's womb. If the embryo is heterozygous, baby may or may not be developed familial hypercholesterolemia. But if the embryo is homozygous embryo must develop familial hypercholesterolemia.

3) Those who developed fatal disease in middle age, should be in proper treatment such as, to prevent familial hypercholesterolemia-

Dietary restrictions- Carbohydrates, protein rich food intake should be done.

Low sodium intake, low Salt intake, prevention of sea food etc.

Regular physical exercise should be done . Antihypertensive drugs should be used as per doctor's order.

4) yes, it is morally permissible. All human beings have right to exist in the world.Disabled person who are suffering horribly through out the life can exist by their own choice. Because they have right to take decision about their existence.


Related Solutions

(a) Does the mother with the wrong embryos have the right to have an abortion (Roe...
(a) Does the mother with the wrong embryos have the right to have an abortion (Roe v. Wade says yes prior to viability). (b) Does the mother who carries the baby but who is not biologically related to the child have ANY rights (visitation/keeping the baby)? (no, legally). (c) Duty/breach/proximate cause and damages against the infertility clinics. What ethics are involved in telling/not telling/timing of telling. Who is responsible -employer/employees (respondeat superior). (d) Is there any duty owed to tell...
You have a one in ten chance of selecting the right outcome and a total of...
You have a one in ten chance of selecting the right outcome and a total of 25 trials. What is the probability that you will get three of fewer successes? What is the probability that you will get more than 7 successes? What is the standard deviation? What is the mean? What is the probability that you will get 4 or more but also no more than 8 successes?
Suppose a particular test of cognitive ability has been found to have great practicality in selecting...
Suppose a particular test of cognitive ability has been found to have great practicality in selecting members of a high school debate team. How much practicality would this same test have for the following situations? Law school application Art school application A police hostage negotiation unit Executive level positions in a labour union Actors in a theme park who spend their day dressed in a character costume
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT