Question

In: Accounting

6) Select the best summary of the finding in the case of Anderson v. Bellino. A)...

6) Select the best summary of the finding in the case of Anderson v. Bellino.

A) The court found that the lotteries are inherently risky and that the two entrepreneurs, Anderson and Bellino assumed the risk of losing their investment.

B)

The court found that partners in a general partnership are not entitled to a salary unless both partners agree.

C)

The court concluded that Bellino, an officer, director, and 50 percent shareholder in LaVista Lottery, Inc. had breached in fiduciary obligations and had unlawfully usurped a corporate opportunity that was rightfully LaVista's.

D)

The court found that, although Bellino, an officer, director, and 50 percent shareholder in LaVista Lottery, Inc. had acted badly, Bellino's actions were protected under the Business Judgment Rule.

7) What is the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA)? Select all that apply.

A.

The Uniform Partnership Act is a federal statute that governs business partnerships in the United States .

B.

The Uniform Partnership Act is a model state law drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws regarding the governance of business partnerships residing in any state within the United States.

C.

The Uniform Partnership Act provides many default rules that apply to a partnership unless the partners agree otherwise.

D) The Uniform Partnership Act requires that partnerships adopt written agreements that govern the relationship among the partners

8. What agency enforces federal securities laws?

A.

Department of the Treasury

B.

Federal Reserve Board

C.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

D.

Securities and Exchange Commission

9. Which of the following are disadvantages of a corporation? Check all that apply.

A.

Strict legal formalities.

B.

Limited capital options.

C.

Entity level taxation.

D.

Joint and several liability among owners for entity obligations.

10. Which of the following factors will a court consider in making a determination to pierce the corporate veil?

A.

Company management has made bad business decisions.

B.

The company's charter does not allow for cumulative voting.

C.

There are only a few shareholders.

D.

Assets of the corporation are commingled with assets of the shareholders.

E.

The company has no board of directors.

F.

Fraud has been perpetrated.

G.

The corporation has failed to observe corporate formalities.

H.

The company suffers from inadequate capitalization.

Solutions

Expert Solution

6) Select the best summary of the finding in the case of Anderson v. Bellino

Answer :C)  

The court concluded that Bellino, an officer, director, and 50 percent shareholder in LaVista Lottery, Inc. had breached in fiduciary obligations and had unlawfully usurped a corporate opportunity that was rightfully LaVista's.

7)What is the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA)? Select all that apply.

Answer :All options are applicable

A. The Uniform Partnership Act is a federal statute that governs business partnerships in the United States .

B. The Uniform Partnership Act is a model state law drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws regarding the governance of business partnerships residing in any state within the United States.

C. The Uniform Partnership Act provides many default rules that apply to a partnership unless the partners agree otherwise.

D) The Uniform Partnership Act requires that partnerships adopt written agreements that govern the relationship among the partners

8. What agency enforces federal securities laws?

Answer :(D)

Securities and Exchange Commission

9. Which of the following are disadvantages of a corporation? Check all that apply.

Answer : A.

Strict legal formalities is disadvantage of corporations. Formation of a corporation is relatively expensive and time-consuming than other business forms as its formation involves strict legal formalities.

10.Which of the following factors will a court consider in making a determination to pierce the corporate veil?

Answer:D, F, G, H

In the following circumstances the law pierce the corporate veil :

(1) failure to observe formalities

(2) commingling of assets

(3) inadequate capitalization

(4) fraud

***In case of any doubts feel free to comment


Related Solutions

Provide a case summary of the case ͞Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]͟ using the...
Provide a case summary of the case ͞Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]͟ using the IRAC method. What was the significance of this case law in relation to the legal concept of separate legal entity? Please i need this answer without plagiarism. thank you
Provide a case summary of the case “Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]” using the...
Provide a case summary of the case “Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]” using the IRAC method. What was the significance of this case law in relation to the legal concept of separate legal entity? Can you use Harvard referencing. thank you very much
Read Case Summary 3.7 Mosher v. Benson on page 85. This case is about a 17...
Read Case Summary 3.7 Mosher v. Benson on page 85. This case is about a 17 year old who purchased a car from an adult. The 17 year old (Mosher) asked to have the transaction reversed on the basis that he was a minor at the time of the contract. Answer the following questions: This case is from the province of Nova Scotia. How would this case likely be resolved in a British Columbia court? Answer this question by describing...
Provide a case summary of the case “Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33”...
Provide a case summary of the case “Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33” using the IRAC method. What legal principle came out of this case in relation to why the court lifted the corporate veil in this case? Please answer this without plagiarism. thanks you very much
Read the summary of the case Mitchell v. Fortis Insurance Company on page 291 of your...
Read the summary of the case Mitchell v. Fortis Insurance Company on page 291 of your textbook. In a 500+ word paper, explain why this is a breach of contract case. What kind of contract is this and who is the breaching party? What kinds of damages are normally awarded for breach of contract? Are punitive damages normally awarded in a case of this type? Why did the court award punitive damages in this case? Do you agree with this...
*** PLEASE SHOW HOW TO SOLVE IN EXCEL*** Case Problem 2:        Finding the Best Car Value...
*** PLEASE SHOW HOW TO SOLVE IN EXCEL*** Case Problem 2:        Finding the Best Car Value (Copy the worksheet named “FamilySedans” in QMB3200-Homework#10Data.xlsx into your file for this problem) When trying to decide what car to buy, real value is not necessarily determined by how much you spend on the initial purchase. Instead, cars that are reliable and don’t cost much to own often represent the best values. But, no matter how reliable or inexpensive a car may cost to...
Please research, Hamer v. Sidway. After finding and reading the case, please do the following: 1)...
Please research, Hamer v. Sidway. After finding and reading the case, please do the following: 1) Give me the legal citation for this case (Hamer v. Sidway). 2) Give me the Issue, Rule, the judge's Analysis, and the judge's Conclusion for Hamer v. Sidway. (In other words: a) What is the main Issue in Hamer v. Sidway; b) What is the main Rule the judge applied to the issue in Hamer v. Sidway; c) What is the judges reasoning (analysis)...
Before completing the assignment, please review the Summary Case, Niles v. City of San Rafael in...
Before completing the assignment, please review the Summary Case, Niles v. City of San Rafael in your text (pgs. 198-199). In this case, negligence was successfully established against both the pediatrician and the hospital. Please reason through the elements of negligence as presented in this case and establish a case against both the pediatrician and hospital individually, utilizing the elements of negligence and the facts presented to make your case.
Read the summary of the Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corporation case in the "Ethics: Implied-in-Fact...
Read the summary of the Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corporation case in the "Ethics: Implied-in-Fact Contract Prevents Unjust Result" section of Ch. 9. It is suggested that you also research and read the full court opinion, using the summary in the textbook to aid your understanding of the legal issues presented. Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper using Microsoft® Word to address the following questions: What type of intellectual property was at issue in this case? Were these ideas...
What would an Executive Summary for this case be? Sneaker 2013 The Situation It was 6:35...
What would an Executive Summary for this case be? Sneaker 2013 The Situation It was 6:35 p.m. on a Friday as Michelle Rodriguez held her head in her hands and sought to regain focus. Her company, New Balance, based in Brighton, Massachusetts, had recently implemented a policy on work-life balance. She had just made the mistake of opening an email from the senior VP of product development, Monte Holliday, who needed a position report by Monday morning on one of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT