Question

In: Finance

Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015?...

Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015? Discuss the implications to issuers and bondholders.

Solutions

Expert Solution

In the most literal sense, negative interest rates are a simple case of supply and demand. A bond is a kind of tradable loan. Whoever is selling the bond is offering to pay the buyer interest in exchange for his money. If there isn't much demand for buying the bonds, the interest rate has to go up to make customers more willing to buy. If there's a lot of demand, the interest rate will fall. Mathematically speaking, nothing special happens to this process when the interest rate hits zero. If there's still a lot of demand, then the rate just goes negative. Simple.

In this specific case, a few things drove the supply/demand dynamic.

One was that European investors were very pessimistic about the overall economic outlook for the continent. That was making them reluctant to invest in risky, but potentially high-yielding ventures. Things like government debt from really well-run northern European countries or banal global food conglomerates were in high demand.

The other reason was that European governments are very reluctant to increase the supply of debt available. Germany, for example, was running a budget surplus, which made German debt scarce. A lot of people around the world would have been happy if Germany went and gave a bunch of money to Greece and Spain, or announced a massive infrastructure building plan, or sharply reduced sales taxes. And if it did that, it would entail a lot of new debt, which would soak up demand. But northern European countries weren't responding to high demand for their debt with more borrowing. So prices just keep falling.

Implications to issuers and​​​​​​​ bondholders

It all got started with Denmark. Denmark doesn't use the euro as its currency. But as an official matter of government policy, it pegs the value of its krone to the value of the euro. But while Denmark's economy looks pretty similar to the economies of Eurozone members like Finland, Germany, or the Netherlands, it's much stronger than Greece or Portugal or Slovenia.

Because of that strength, foreign investors have the notion that in the long-term, the value of the krone is likely to go up relative to the value of the euro. If you think of buying Danish bonds as a currency play, then buying them at negative interest rates can make sense.

This was all a little strange, but not all that unexpected. It just turned out that the dynamics around small countries trying to maintain currency parity with much larger neighbors were a little bit weird.

Things changed in January 2015 when the Eurozone's central bank launched a program of quantitative easing — in other words, printing money and using it to buy government bonds.

Three major motivations that market insiders say were in play:

  • Safety: A bond is backed by the full faith and credit of the government that issues it. Bank accounts are only government-guaranteed up to a certain extent — most European countries cover 100,000 euros. Very rich people and big companies have more money than that and need to do something with it. Obviously you could fill shoe boxes with paper money, but there are safety risks with that, too.
  • Passive funds: Because people thought negative interest rates were impossible, few institutions have rules in place that were designed to accommodate this situation. Pension funds, mutual funds, and other impersonal investment vehicles have rules and formulae they're supposed to be following. To the extent that those rules call for the holding of safe bonds, some bond-buying can simply happen on autopilot.
  • Banks: Banks can't store their spare money in a bank account. Instead, they store reserves with a government-run central bank. A certain amount of reserves are required by regulators. But banks can also store "excess" reserves. The European Central Bank is currently charging a fee on excess reserves, which means it makes more sense to park excess cash in government bonds.

Related Solutions

Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015?...
Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015? Discuss the implications to issuers and bondholders.
“Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015?...
“Explain why several government bond yields (including German, Finish and Swiss) turned negative in January 2015? Discuss the implications to issuers and bondholders"
Current conditions (June 2020) in global government bond markets see yields close to zero. Explain what...
Current conditions (June 2020) in global government bond markets see yields close to zero. Explain what this indicates for the future performance of bond funds pursuing interest rate anticipation strategies?
Explain why pollution is considered a negative externality. Give two possible government solutions to the problem....
Explain why pollution is considered a negative externality. Give two possible government solutions to the problem. Then give a possible economic reason why government might fail to resolve the problem.
Explain why pollution is considered a negative externality. Give two possible government solutions to the problem....
Explain why pollution is considered a negative externality. Give two possible government solutions to the problem. Then give a possible economic reason why government might fail to resolve the problem.
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond...
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond is always absolutely safe. ( I want 500 word and I need text not picture please )
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond...
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond is always absolutely safe. ( I want more 500 word with refrencess and I need text not picture please )
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond...
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond is always absolutely safe. ( I want 500 word with refrencess and I need text not picture please )
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond...
Explain whether the following statement is correct, and if not why?A long term US government bond is always absolutely safe. ( I want 500 word please)  
Use the three types of bond risks to explain why the U.S. government bonds are considered...
Use the three types of bond risks to explain why the U.S. government bonds are considered such a safe investment. What is the trade-off that accompanies this low risk?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT