In: Accounting
Considering all your findings using the different methods of analysis ( 2017 through 2018 financial statements, annual reports, horizontal and vertical analysis ) on the financial statements for Target and Amazon, which company would you more likely invest in?
Your response to this question should be 3 paragraphs:
Target Horizontal/Vertical Analysis Information
Horizontal analysis is a procedure in which the amounts in financial statements of 2017 will be compared with 2018 line by line in order to make related decision.
Vertical analysis is a method of analysis of financial statement where each line item is listed asa a percentage of another item ( one year i.e. 2017)
ANALYSIS ::
TARGET | ||||||
HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS | ||||||
DESCRIPTION | 2018 | 2017 | Difference | % Change | ||
TOTAL REVENUE | 7,18,79,000.00 | 6,94,95,000.00 | 23,84,000.00 | 3.43 | ||
OPERATING INCOME | 43,12,000.00 | 49,69,000.00 | -6,57,000.00 | -13.22 | ||
BASIC EPS | 0.0053 | 0.0047 | 0.0006 | 12.77 | ||
EBIT | 43,12,000.00 | 49,69,000.00 | -6,57,000.00 | -13.22 | ||
VERTICAL ANALYSIS | ||||||
NET INCOME | 27,37,000.00 | 3.94 | ||||
TOTAL REVENUE | 6,94,95,000.00 | 100 | ||||
KEY POINTS | Operating Income and EBIT both are negative. | |||||
AMAZON | ||||||
HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS | ||||||
DESCRIPTION | 2018 | 2017 | Difference | % Change | ||
TOTAL REVENUE | 23,28,87,000.00 | 17,78,66,000.00 | 5,50,21,000.00 | 30.93 | ||
OPERATING INCOME | 1,24,21,000.00 | 41,06,000.00 | 83,15,000.00 | 202.51 | ||
BASIC EPS | 20.68 | 6.32 | 14.3600 | 227.22 | ||
EBITDA | 2,80,19,000.00 | 1,61,32,000.00 | 1,18,87,000.00 | 73.69 | ||
VERTICAL ANALYSIS | ||||||
NET INCOME | 30,33,000.00 | 1.71 | ||||
TOTAL REVENUE | 17,78,66,000.00 | 100 | ||||
KEY POINTS | Sales revenue grew by 31% | |||||
Operating Income grew by 202.5% | ||||||
EBITDA grew by 74% | ||||||
INVESTMENT DECISION | ||||||
AMAZON is a better investment option because sales revenue growth is more than TARGET | ||||||
Operating income is negative for TARGET, whereas it grew by whopping 203% for AMAZON | ||||||
EBIT is negative in case of TARGET, whereas in case of AMAZON it grew by 74%. | ||||||
Net income as a percentage of total revenue of AMAZON is less than TARGET, mainly due to | ||||||
depreciation and interest expenses. But looking at sales growth and operating income, net income | ||||||
of AMAZON will improve in coming years when depreciation and interest expenses will fall due | ||||||
lower depreciation and reduced interest owing to repayment of debt. |