In: Finance
Mischief Company had been experimenting with various sales and operations plans. As the firm started to lay out plans for next year, management decided to use a six-month planning horizon to reduce computation cost. The firm’s basic data were: Employment level for this December = 20 people. Demand forecasts for January to June of next year are 200, 240, 220, 300, 250, and 240 units respectively. Inventory level planned for the end of this December = 0. Back-orders aren’t allowed in the plan. Desired April ending inventory = 0. Regular time per month = $2,000 per worker-month. Production = 12 units/person/month. Overtime premium = 50 percent of regular time. Overtime limit = 25 percent of regular time per person per month. Inventory carrying cost = $150/month/unit (on the average per month). Hiring (or firing) cost = $2,000 per person.
to compare the cost of a fixed employment production plan (i.e., 20 people) that uses overtime to meet the demand to a level production plan that uses no overtime to meet production.
Please refer to the calculaction below comparing total cost in fixed employment production plan in comparison to Total cost in plan that uses no overtime (new hire or fire).
Conclusion:
Total cost in fixed employment plan = USD 318500
Total cost in No overtime production plan = USD 348750.
Hence, Fixed empoyment plan (with overtime when needed) to be noted.
Please note: Inventory balance at the end of april to be taken as 0. Hence accordingly, the production units oid adjusted in below solution.