In: Accounting
Question 4: Service department cost allocation
Inns Battery Company has two service departments: Maintenance and Personnel. Maintenance Department costs are allocated on the basis of budgeted maintenance-hours. Personnel Department costs are allocated based on the number of employees. Data on budgeted maintenance-hours and number of employees are as follows:
Support Departments |
Production Departments |
|||
Maintenance Department |
Personnel Department |
A |
B |
|
Budgeted costs |
$180,000 |
$30,000 |
$80,000 |
$120,000 |
Budgeted maintenance-hours |
n/a |
240 |
720 |
240 |
Number of employees |
20 |
n/a |
60 |
120 |
Required:
4a. Using the direct method, determine the amount of support department costs to be allocated to Production Department A.
4b. Using the step-down method, determine the amount of Maintenance Department costs to be allocated to Production Department A, if the service department with the highest percentage of interdepartmental support service is allocated first.
4c. Using the reciprocal method, determine the amount of maintenance department costs to be allocated to Production Department A (round up to nearest dollar).
4d. List and explain two possible reasons why a manager might prefer that budgeted rather than actual cost-allocation rates be used when cost is being allocated to his/her department from another department. Use the textbook and/or other relevant resources to support your answer.
Maintenance cost allocated to ‘A’ = 720/(720 + 240) = 75%
Maintenance cost allocated to ‘B’ = 240/(720 + 240) = 25%
Personnel cost allocated to ‘A’ = 60/(60+120) = 33.333%
Personnel cost allocated to ‘B’ = 120/(60 + 120) = 66.67%
Allocation table:
Department |
Supplying (Service Department) |
Using Department |
|||
Maintenance |
Personnel |
A |
B |
||
Budgeted Cost |
$ 180,000.00 |
$ 30,000.00 |
$ 80,000.00 |
$ 120,000.00 |
|
Allocation of: |
|||||
Maintenance |
$ (180,000.00) |
$ 135,000.00 (75%) |
$ 45,000.00 (25%) |
||
Personnel |
$ (30,000.00) |
$ 10,000.00 (33.333%) |
$ 20,000.00 (66.667%) |
||
Total cost after allocation have been made |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 225,000.00 |
$ 185,000.00 |
Answer: Support cost allocated to Department ‘A’ = $ 135,000 + $ 10,000 = $ 145,000
Step Down Method allocation
Departments |
|||||
Support Departments |
Maintenance |
Personnel |
A |
B |
|
Maintenance |
20.00% |
60% |
20% |
100% |
|
Personnel |
10% |
30% |
60% |
100% |
Allocation table:
Department |
Supplying (Service Department) |
Using Department |
|||
Maintenance |
Personnel |
A |
B |
||
Budgeted Cost |
$ 180,000.00 |
$ 30,000.00 |
$ 80,000.00 |
$ 120,000.00 |
|
Allocation of: |
|||||
Maintenance |
$ (180,000.00) |
$ 36,000.00 (20%) |
$ 108,000.00 (60%) |
$ 36,000.00 (20%) |
|
Personnel |
$ - |
$ (66,000.00) |
$ 22,000.00 (33.333%) |
$ 44,000.00 (66.667%) |
|
Total cost after allocation have been made |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 210,000.00 |
$ 200,000.00 |
Answer: Maintenance cost allocated to Production Department ‘A’ = $ 108,000 [180000 x 60%]
Workings
Service Department |
Direct Cost |
% of service receivables from other service department |
Let the Total cost be: |
|
Maintenance |
$ 180,000.00 |
10% |
From Personnel |
X |
Personnel |
$ 30,000.00 |
20% |
From Maintenance |
Y |
Equation #1 |
X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
10% |
of |
Y |
X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
0.1Y |
|||
Equation #2 |
Y |
= |
30000 |
+ |
20% |
of |
X |
Y |
= |
30000 |
+ |
0.2X |
Putting the Value of 'Y' into Equation #1 |
||||||
X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
0.1(30000 + 0.2X) |
||
X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
(3000 + 0.02X) |
||
X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
3000 |
+ |
0.02X |
X |
- |
0.02X |
= |
180000 |
+ |
3000 |
0.98X |
= |
183000 |
||||
X |
= |
183000 / 0.98 |
||||
X |
= |
186734.6939 |
Putting the Value of 'X' calculated above into Equation #2 |
||||||
Y |
= |
30000 |
+ |
20% |
of |
X |
Y |
= |
30000 |
+ |
20% |
x |
186734.6939 |
Y |
= |
30000 |
+ |
37346.93878 |
||
Y |
= |
67346.93878 |
Service Department |
Maintenance calculated as 'X' |
||
Using Departments: |
Total cost to be allocated |
% of service used |
Cost allocated |
Personnel |
$ 186,734.69 |
20% |
$ 37,346.94 |
A |
60% |
$ 112,040.82 |
|
B |
20% |
$ 37,346.94 |
|
0 |
|||
Total cost allocated |
$ 186,734.69 |
Service Department |
Personnel calculated as 'Y' |
||
Using Departments: |
Total cost to be allocated |
% of service used |
Cost allocated |
Maintenance |
$ 67,346.94 |
10% |
$ 6,734.69 |
A |
30% |
$ 20,204.08 |
|
B |
60% |
$ 40,408.16 |
|
0 |
0% |
$ - |
|
Total cost allocated |
$ 67,346.94 |
Allocation Table:
Department |
Supplying (Service Department) |
Using Department |
|||
Maintenance |
Personnel |
A |
B |
||
Budgeted Cost |
$ 180,000 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 80,000 |
$ 120,000 |
|
Allocation of: |
|||||
Maintenance |
$ (186,735) |
$ 37,347 |
$ 112,041 |
$ 37,347 |
|
Personnel |
$ 6,735 |
$ (67,347) |
$ 20,204 |
$ 40,408 |
|
Total cost after allocation have been made |
$ (0) |
$ - |
$ 212,245 |
$ 197,755 |
Answer: Amount of Maintenance cost allocated to Production Dept ‘A’ = $ 112,041
Two possible reasons can be:
>The inefficiencies at the department providing the services do not affect the costs allocated to the user department because user departments cost will be based on budgeted rates.
>The user knows the cost in advance and can use them accordingly into on-going operating decisions.