Question

In: Operations Management

In relation to the Sale of Goods Act 1957, explain the following: (a) Implied condition as to title.

In relation to the Sale of Goods Act 1957, explain the following: (a) Implied condition as to title. 

According to the laws of Malaysia Act 382 sales of goods act 1957 section14(a) states that an implied condition on the part of the seller, that, in the case of a sale, he has a right to sell the goods, and that, in the case of an agreement to sell, he will have a right to sell the goods at the time when the property is to pass.


Solutions

Expert Solution

             Section 14-17 of the Sales of Goods Act, 1957 deal with the concept of implied terms. These implied concepts are applicable in every contract of sale of goods. Section 14 deals with the implied condition on part of the seller and states that he has a right to sell goods . When there is an agreement to sell, there is an implied condition that the seller has to ensure the buyer that he will enjoy ownership and possession of goods and can use them. If the seller fails to deliver or pass on the goods at the decided time, the buyer has the right to reject the contract. Another concept is that of implied warranty which states that the buyer is allowed to enjoy quit possession and ownership of goods. If the seller fails to comply with the condition, the buyer can claim damages. Moreover, there is a concept that the goods shall be free from any charge in respect of any third party that is not declared or made known to buyer before or at the time the contract is made.

             Section 15 of the Act deals with sale of goods by description. If the contract is made for sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition which refers to the fact that the goods shall correspond to the description. If the sale is made by the sample as well as the description, it is not sufficient for the bulk to correspond to the sample if the goods are not as per the description.

             Section 16 of the Act states that there is no implied condition or any implied warranty for the quality or the fitness for any particular purpose of goods. This condition is important when the buyer requests the goods to be reasonable for a purpose or the goods be of merchantable quality.

             Section 17 of the Act is about the goods being dealt with sample. The bulk of goods must correspond to the sample of the goods shown or sent. If the seller fails to do so, the buyer can reject the contract under implied condition.


Related Solutions

Discuss to what extend the right of lien as provided under the sale of goods Act 1957 protects the seller
BUSINESS LAW IN MALAYSIADiscuss to what extend the right of lien as provided under the sale of goods Act 1957 protects the seller. support your answer with three decided cases.
Explain any THREE (3) exceptions to the nemo dat rule under the Sale of Goods Act...
Explain any THREE (3) exceptions to the nemo dat rule under the Sale of Goods Act 1957. ( 10 mark)
One of the main purposes of the Sale of Goods Act is to supply, by implication,...
One of the main purposes of the Sale of Goods Act is to supply, by implication, many of the terms that have been inadvertently left out of contracts involving the purchase of goods. Do the terms of the Act excessively interfere with the principles of freedom of contract and caveat emptor?
Under sale of Goods Act 1930. Pakistan Define the term Sale and agreement to Sell. Enlist...
Under sale of Goods Act 1930. Pakistan Define the term Sale and agreement to Sell. Enlist the essentials of valid Sale. Although both terms are derived from one definition and apparently Looks Similar but in actual there is huge difference between the both Terms, on what legal grounds we can distinguish between Sale and Agreement to sell. (400 words)
Under sale of Goods Act 1930. Who is unpaid seller, what are his rights against Goods...
Under sale of Goods Act 1930. Who is unpaid seller, what are his rights against Goods and has he any remedy against the buyer personally? (more then 200 words)
Explain the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition, and their relation to conditional statements....
Explain the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition, and their relation to conditional statements. Provide an example, and give it in both standard form and symbolic form. philosophy critical thinking class
Explain and provide an example for the following job order cost system entries: sale of goods...
Explain and provide an example for the following job order cost system entries: sale of goods to the customer, administrative costs incurred and selling costs incurred. For each journal entry, identify if the cost being recorded is a product cost or a period cost.
Explain any THREE (3) implied terms which are stated in the Hire Purchase Act 1967. (10...
Explain any THREE (3) implied terms which are stated in the Hire Purchase Act 1967. (10 mark)
Which of the following is not covered by the Fair Trading Act: Sale of milk by...
Which of the following is not covered by the Fair Trading Act: Sale of milk by a Dairy Shop Sale of a work of Art by an antiques shop A private sale of goods by Fred who is clearing old items from his garage Sale of a motor car by a car dealer at her car dealership The Fair-Trading Act 1986 is enforced by: The Registrar of Lands The Registrar of Companies The Commerce Commission The Insurance Ombudsman f a...
In relation to Contracts Act 1950, explain what is meant by “consideration need not be adequate...
In relation to Contracts Act 1950, explain what is meant by “consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient”. (10 mark
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT