Question

In: Economics

Tyler just wrecked his new​ Nissan, and the accident was his fault. The owner of the...

Tyler just wrecked his new​ Nissan, and the accident was his fault. The owner of the other vehicle got two estimates for the​ repairs: one was for ​$613 and the other was for ​$674. Tyler is thinking of keeping the insurance companies out of the incident to keep his driving record​ "clean." Tyler's deductible on his comprehensive coverage insurance is ​$550, and he does not want his premium to increase because of the accident. In this​ regard, Tyler estimates that his​ semi-annual premium will rise by ​$50 if he files a claim against his insurance company. In view of the above​ information, Tyler's initial decision is to write a personal check for ​$613 payable to the owner of the other vehicle. Assume that Tyler keeps his Nissan for four more years and that his premiums do not change each subsequent year. What is the cost of claiming to the insurance​ company? Did Tyler make the most economical decision​ (as opposed to claiming to the insurance​ company)? What other options should Tyler have explored depending on assumptions​ made?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Another option: submit the claim, and the insurance company would pay $550 towards the bill, most likely. That means Tyler has to pay the remainder, i.e. 613-550=$63, using the lower estimate. His rates may (or may not) increase by $60 50 semi-annually. If they do, that is $120 100 more per year. In his first thought, he pays $613. If he uses his insurance, his immediate out-of-pocket expense is $63, which is $550 less. Even though his insurance premium goes up by $50 every six months, it will take 11 six-month periods for that extra cost to add up to $550.

By using his insurance (which he paid for), he keeps more of his money in his own pocket for his own use. A $60 50 increase in his premium every 6 months is only $8.33 a month. In his initial decision, he is 'out' $63 right now. If he uses the insurance, he is only 'out' $63 right now, and it will take 6 years before the added premiums add up to the other $550. It would be wiser to use the insurance,

Thus the answers of the questions will be:-

What is the cost of claiming to the insurance company? :- $8.33 per month

Did Tyler make the most economical decision (as opposed to claiming to the insurance company)? No, he should use insurance


Related Solutions

Tyler just wrecked his new? Nissan, and the accident was his fault. The owner of the...
Tyler just wrecked his new? Nissan, and the accident was his fault. The owner of the other vehicle got two estimates for the? repairs: one was for ?$615 and the other was for ?$667. Tyler is thinking of keeping the insurance companies out of the incident to keep his driving record? "clean." Tyler's deductible on his comprehensive coverage insurance is ?$500, and he does not want his premium to increase because of the accident. In this? regard, Tyler estimates that...
Ignacio was involved in an auto accident in which he was at fault. His own car...
Ignacio was involved in an auto accident in which he was at fault. His own car sustained $3,827 damages and the other vehicle cost $1,709 to repair. Ignacio was not injured, but the driver of the other car required medical treatment costing 34,550 and the passangers injuries totaled $3,944. Ignacio's policy includes 15/30/10 liabilty, $250 deductible collision and $100 deductible comprehensive. How much of the damages must the insurance company pay? a.$ 24,230 b.$ 30,000 c.$ 43,680 d.$ 21,840
Rusty has an accident where he is at fault. His automobile insurance coverage is 60/120/15.
Rusty has an accident where he is at fault. His automobile insurance coverage is 60/120/15. Two people were hurt and the court awarded them $60,000 each for injuries in the accident.a) How much will the insurance company pay of those "awards?"b) How much will Rusty have to pay himself?
Tiffany is in an automobile accident, and both parties are partially at fault. Tiffany is judged...
Tiffany is in an automobile accident, and both parties are partially at fault. Tiffany is judged to be 40 percent at fault and the other driver is judged to be 60 percent at fault. Tiffany’s actual damages are $60,000. Under a pure comparative negligence law, how much, if anything, does Tiffany receive for her injury? Explain why.
A survey of 200 drivers who were at fault in an accident found that 62% were...
A survey of 200 drivers who were at fault in an accident found that 62% were dropped by their insurance carrier. Conduct a hypothesis test at a 0.10 level of significance to determine if the percentage of drivers dropped by the insurance carrier is different than 60%. State the null and alternate hypotheses. Please show work
A survey of 200 drivers who were at fault in an accident found that 62% were...
A survey of 200 drivers who were at fault in an accident found that 62% were dropped by their insurance carrier. Conduct a hypothesis test at a 0.10 level of significance to determine if the percentage of drivers dropped by the insurance carrier is different than 60%. State the null and alternate hypotheses. Use whichever applicable approach to hypothesis testing that you prefer, specify the numerical comparisons to be made, and state your conclusion.
Employee Fringe Benefits Julie lost a hand in a car accident (on her own fault) that...
Employee Fringe Benefits Julie lost a hand in a car accident (on her own fault) that caused her to miss work for 6 months. The car accident was unrelated to her work. The accident and health insurance policy was purchased (carried) by Julie’s employer. The premiums paid by Julie’s employer were $2,000. Julie received $6,000 on an income replacement policy purchased by Julie’s employer. Finally, Julie collected $30,000, a payment for loss of a hand, according to the insurance policy....
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of...
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of $40,000, $40,000, $50,000 and $50,000. Rebecca has 50/150 bodily injury liability coverage. What amount, if any, would not be covered by her insurance? Select one: a. $180,000 b. $150,000 c. $50,000 d. $30,000 e. None. The total amount would be covered by insurance .
Josh Edwards was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Three others were awarded damages of...
Josh Edwards was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Three others were awarded damages of $200,000, $100,000, and $100,000. Josh has 100/400 bodily injury liability coverage. What amount, if any, would not be covered by his insurance? Select one: a. $200,000 b. $100,000 c. $50,000 d. $25,000 e. None. The total amount would be covered by insurance .
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of...
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of $40,000, $40,000, $50,000 and $50,000. Rebecca has 50/150 bodily injury liability coverage. What amount, if any, would not be covered by her insurance? Select one: a. $180,000 b. $150,000 c. $50,000 d. $30,000 e. None. The total amount would be covered by insuranc
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT