Question

Melanie and Gabriela have a dispute regarding ownership of a dog, Buddy. Gabriela removed Buddy's tags in order to give him a bath. Knowing what was coming, Buddy made a run for it and ended up at Melanie's home down the street. When Gabriela saw Melanie walking Buddy, she demanded his return. Melanie refused. A lawyer in the neighborhood suggested either a neutral case evaluation or mediation in an attempt to resolve the feud. Describe mediation and neutral case evaluation. Which would you suggest and why? In addition, discuss how is arbitration preferable to litigation, and what are criticisms of arbitration as compared to litigation?

Answer 1

Here we will discuss the case of Melanie and Gabriela regarding the ownership of a dog buddy. Therefore, we will discuss the case of neutral case evaluation and meditation in an attempt to resolve a feud along with which one is best and why we will also be discussing the arbitration to litigation and the criticism of arbitration as compared to litigation.

Getting into the case of Melanie and Gabriela, meditation is a good option when it comes to the resolve of a feud, but meditation is not much active because in a short-term to resolve a feud it is not much action, but in case of a long-term feud it is a great option to get in. However, in this case, neutral case evaluation is the best hue in an attempt to resolve a feud because, in the case of neutral case evaluation, the experts evaluate the whole case and telling both partners the best advice, keeping in mind the depth of the case. Therefore, neutral case evaluation is the best option for resolving the feud between Melanie and Gabriela regarding the ownership of the dog buddy.

If we see the records, we concluded that litigation is much preferable than arbitration because the arbitrator can get biased while taking the decision and can turn the tables out in one direction without considering the other direction/aspects of the other party. Therefore, litigation is a much preferable option. The criticism of arbitration as compared to litigation includes higher costs, and much of the time, as the comparison with the litigation, also the arbitrators can get buy used, but in case of litigation, the judge will not get buyers while taking the decisions.