In: Finance
Hello - I'm looking for the answer to the F question below:
|
You must analyze a potential new product--a caulking compound that Cory Mateials' R&D people developed for use in the |
| residential construction industry. Cory's marketing manager thinks the company can sell 115,000 tubes per year for 3 |
| years at a price of $3.25 each, after which the product will be obsolete. The required equipment would cost $150,000, plus |
| another $25,000 for shipping and installation. Current assets (receivables and inventories) would increase by $35,000, |
| while current liabilities (accounts payable and accruals) would rise by $15,000. Variable costs would be 60% of sales |
| revenues, fixed costs (exclusive of depreciation) would be $70,000 per year, and fixed assets would be depreciated under |
| MACRS with a 3-year life. (Yr1 = 33%, Yr2 = 45%, Yr3 = 15%, Yr4 = 7%) When production ceases after 3 years, |
| the equipment should have a market value of $15,000. Cory's tax rate is 40%, and it uses a 10% WACC for average-risk |
| projects. |
| a. Find the required Year 0 investment and the project's annual net cash flows. Then calculate the project's |
| NPV, IRR, MIRR, and payback. Assume at this point that the project is of average risk. |
| b. Suppose you now learn that R&D costs for the new product were $30,000 and that those costs were incurred and |
| expensed for tax purposes last year. How would this affect your estimate of NPV and other profitability measures? |
| c. If the new project would reduce cash flows from Cory's other projects and if the new project would be housed |
| in an empty building that Cory owns and could sell, how would those factors affect the project's NPV? |
| d. Are this project's cash flows likely to be positively or negatively correlated with returns on Cory's other |
| projects and with the economy, and should this matter in your analysis? Explain. |
| e. Unrelated to the new product, Cory is analyzing two mutually exclusive machines that will upgrade its manufacturing |
| plant. These machines are considered average-risk projects, so management will evaluate them at the firm's 10% |
| WACC. Machine X has a life of 4 years, while Machine Y has a life of 2 years. The cost of each machine is $60,000; |
| however, Machine X provides after-tax cash flows of $25,000 per year for 4 years and Machine Y provides after-tax cash |
| flows of $42,000 per year for 2 years. The manufacturing plant is very successful, so the machines manufacturing |
| plant is very successful, so the machines will be repurchased at the end of each machine's useful life. In other words, |
| the machines are "repeatable" projects. |
| (1) Using the replacement chain approach, what is the NPV of the better machine? |
| (2) Using the EAA approach, what is the EAA of the better machine? |
| f. The CEO expressed concern that some of the base-case inputs might be too optimistic or too pessimistic. He |
| wants to know how the NPV would be affected if these 6 variables were all 20% better or 20% worse than |
| the base-case level: unit sales, sales price, variable costs, fixed costs, WACC, and equipment cost. Hold |
| other things constant when you consider each variable, and construct a sensitivity graph to illustrate your |
| results. |
Hello - I'm looking for the answer the F questions:
| f. The CEO expressed concern that some of the base-case inputs might be too optimistic or too pessimistic. He | ||||||
| wants to know how the NPV would be affected if these 6 variables were all 20% better or 20% worse than | ||||||
| the base-case level: unit sales, sales price, variable costs, fixed costs, WACC, and equipment cost. Hold | ||||||
| other things constant when you consider each variable, and construct a sensitivity graph to illustrate your | ||||||
| results. | ||||||
F)
The Base NPV value is $4014 which has been indicated in yellow all throughout the excel below.
| % Deviation From Base Case | Unit Sales | |||||
| Unit Sales | NPV ($) | % Deviation From Base Case | WACC | |||
| 4014 | WACC | NPV ($) | ||||
| -20% | 92000 | -40600 | 4014 | |||
| -10% | 103500 | -18293 | -20% | 8% | 11569 | |
| 0% | 115000 | 4014 | -10% | 9% | 7733 | |
| 10% | 126500 | 26321 | 0% | 10% | 4014 | |
| 20% | 138000 | 48628 | 10% | 11% | 407 | |
| 20% | 12% | -3093 | ||||
| % Deviation From Base Case | Variable Costs | % Deviation From Base Case | Sales Price | |||
| Variable Costs($) | NPV ($) | Sales Price($) | NPV ($) | |||
| 4014 | 4014 | |||||
| -20% | 1.56 | 70935 | -20% | 2.6 | -40600 | |
| -10% | 1.76 | 37475 | -10% | 2.93 | -18293 | |
| 0% | 1.95 | 4014 | 0% | 3.25 | 4014 | |
| 10% | 2.15 | -29446 | 10% | 3.58 | 26321 | |
| 20% | 2.34 | -62907 | 20% | 3.9 | 48628 | |
| % Deviation From Base Case | Fixed Costs | % Deviation From Base Case | Equipment Costs | |||
| Fixed Costs($) | NPV ($) | Equipment Costs($) | NPV ($) | |||
| 4014 | 4014 | |||||
| -20% | 56000 | 24904 | -20% | 140000 | 27294 | |
| -10% | 63000 | 14459 | -10% | 157500 | 15654 | |
| 0% | 70000 | 4014 | 0% | 175000 | 4014 | |
| 10% | 77000 | -6431 | 10% | 192500 | -7625 | |
| 20% | 84000 | -16875 | 20% | 210000 | -19265 | |
| NPV At Different Deviations From Base | ||||||
| % Deviation From Base Case | Sales Price($) | Variable Cost($) | Unit Sales($) | Fixed Cost($) | WACC($) | Euipment Cost($) |
| -20% | -40600 | 70935 | -40600 | 24904 | 11569 | 27294 |
| -10% | -18293 | 37475 | -18293 | 14459 | 7733 | 15654 |
| 0% | 4014 | 4014 | 4014 | 4014 | 4014 | 4014 |
| 10% | 26321 | -29446 | 26321 | -6431 | 407 | -7625 |
| 20% | 48628 | -62907 | 48628 | -16875 | -3093 | -19265 |
The graph of Sensitivity Analysis has been derived from the table above.
