In: Finance
Stock |
Zarumba |
Beta |
Actual Return |
A |
0.08 |
2.00 |
32.0% |
B |
0.24 |
1.75 |
32.0% |
C |
0.07 |
1.20 |
24.0% |
D |
0.04 |
0.50 |
12.0% |
E |
0.03 |
0.25 |
8.5% |
Chicken Mcspirkle |
Calculation of Returns |
Given |
Risk free rate =Rf=4% |
Expected Market Return=Rm=20% |
Let the Retuen of Stock be Re |
Ans i | |||||||
Stocks | Beta | Return as per CAPM : Re=Rf+beta*(Rm-Rf) | Zarumba | Return using Zarumba : E®=3*Zarumba% | Actual Return | Difference of Actual return with CAPM return | Difference of Actual return with Zarumba return |
A | 2 | 36.00% | 0.08 | 24.0% | 32% | -4.00% | 8.00% |
B | 1.75 | 32.00% | 0.24 | 72.0% | 32% | 0.00% | -40.00% |
C | 1.2 | 23.20% | 0.07 | 21.0% | 24% | 0.80% | 3.00% |
D | 0.5 | 12.00% | 0.04 | 12.0% | 12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
E | 0.25 | 8.00% | 0.03 | 9.0% | 8.5% | 0.50% | -0.50% |
Ans ii | ||||||
From the above table it is clear that there is abnormal difference in stock A against actual result by CAPM methos. | ||||||
In Zarumba methos, there are abnormal returns in stock A, B & C against actual result. The result of stock B is particularly | ||||||
abnormal by a great degree. |
Ansii | ||||||
It is difficult to determine whether the market is efficient. The return for a stock should be proportional to the risk | ||||||
associated. Here both stock A & B giving 32% return , but their beta are different and the Zarumba factors are hugely | ||||||
different . So it is not clear of the market is effcient to reflect their risk factors. |