Question

In: Accounting

On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,600,000 for land, Building 1, Building...

On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,600,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $701,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $488,000 and is expected to last another 16 years with no salvage value. The land is valued at $1,860,500. The company also incurs the following additional costs.

Cost to demolish Building 1$344,400 Cost of additional land grading 195,400 Cost to construct Building 3, having a useful life
of 25 years and a $400,000 salvage value 2,222,000 Cost of new Land Improvements 2
having a 20-year useful life and no salvage value 178,000

. Allocate the costs incurred by Mitzu to the appropriate columns and total each column.

Need help with the percentages

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

Allocation of Purchase Price

Appraised Value

% of total appraised value

X

Total Cost of Acquisition

=

Apportioned Cost

Land

$1,860,500

61%

(1,860,500 / 3,050,000) X100

X

$2,600,000

=

$1,586,000

Building 2

$701,500

23%

(701,500 / 3,050,000) X100

X

$2,600,000

=

$598,000

Land improvement 1

$488,000

16%

(488,000 / 3,050,000)X100

X

$2,600,000

=

$416,000

TOTAL

$3,050,000

100%

$2,600,000






Particulars

Land

Building 2

Building 3

Land Improvements 1

Land Improvements 2

Purchase price

$1,586,000

$598,000

-

$416,000

-

Demolition*

$344,400

-

-

-

-

Land Grading

$195,400

New building (Construction cost)

-

-

$2,222,000

-

-

New improvements

$178,000

TOTAL

$2,125,800

$598,000

$2,222,000

$416,000

$178,000


*The cost of demolition of building 1 can be directly attributable to cost of the land ( Reference IAS 16 par. 16).


Related Solutions

In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on...
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $750,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $85,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot near Building 1 has improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $360,000 that are expected to last another 12 years with no...
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish
Question: In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,600,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolishBuilding 1 and building a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at$644,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $60,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot near Building1 has improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $420,000 that are expected to last another 12 yearswith no salvage value. Without...
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,700,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on...
In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,700,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $570,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $85,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot near Building 1 has improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $570,000 that are expected to last another 19 years with no...
LAB QUESTION 1 On January 1, 2018, Major Company pays a lump sum amount of $2,000,000...
LAB QUESTION 1 On January 1, 2018, Major Company pays a lump sum amount of $2,000,000 for Land, Building 1, Building 2 and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $1,440,000 with a useful life of 20 years and a salvage value of $200,000. Land Improvements 1 is appraised at $240,000 with a useful life of 5 years and a salvage value of $40,000. The...
Western purchased land and a building for the lump sum of $3,000,000. To maximize their tax...
Western purchased land and a building for the lump sum of $3,000,000. To maximize their tax deduction, Western allocated 90% of the purchase price to the building and only 10% to the land. A more realistic allocation based on assessed value would have been 70% to the building and 30% to the land. 1. What impact(s) will these actions have on the company’s financial statements? Be sure to discuss the balance sheet and the income statement separately, and be specific...
1)You purchase an annuity investment that pays you a lump sum amount of $289,284 at the...
1)You purchase an annuity investment that pays you a lump sum amount of $289,284 at the end of the term. You must make $20,000 quarterly payments until the end of the term. If you earn an interest rate of 2%, how many of these quarterly payments must you make? 2) A bank lends money to a firm on 01/01/2010. According to the lending agreement, the bank will receive the following payments: 06/30/2010 - $2,300,000 12/31/2010 - $1,300,000 06/30/2011 - $5,700,000...
(8-3) [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays...
(8-3) [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In January 2017, Mitzu Co. pays $2,700,000 for a tract of land with two buildings on it. It plans to demolish Building 1 and build a new store in its place. Building 2 will be a company office; it is appraised at $678,500, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. A lighted parking lot near Building 1 has improvements (Land Improvements 1) valued at $501,500...
Teal Co. is building a new hockey arena at a cost of $2,600,000. It received a...
Teal Co. is building a new hockey arena at a cost of $2,600,000. It received a downpayment of $460,000 from local businesses to support the project, and now needs to borrow $2,140,000 to complete the project. It therefore decides to issue $2,140,000 of 12%, 10-year bonds. These bonds were issued on January 1, 2016, and pay interest annually on each January 1. The bonds yield 11%. Prepare the journal entry to record the issuance of the bonds on January 1,...
Splish Co. is building a new hockey arena at a cost of $2,600,000. It received a...
Splish Co. is building a new hockey arena at a cost of $2,600,000. It received a downpayment of $460,000 from local businesses to support the project, and now needs to borrow $2,140,000 to complete the project. It therefore decides to issue $2,140,000 of 12%, 10-year bonds. These bonds were issued on January 1, 2019, and pay interest annually on each January 1. The bonds yield 11%. Prepare the journal entry to record the issuance of the bonds on January 1,...
1. Perry Corporation acquired land, buildings, and equipment from a bankrupt company at a lump-sum price...
1. Perry Corporation acquired land, buildings, and equipment from a bankrupt company at a lump-sum price of $825,000. At the time of acquisition Perry paid $30,000 to have the assets appraised. The appraisal disclosed the following values: Land $480,000 Buildings 348,000 Equipment 96,000 What cost should be assigned to the land, buildings, and equipment, respectively? $427,500, $342,000, and $85,500. $412,500, $330,000, and $82,500. $480,000, $384,000, and $96,000. $285,000, $285,000, and $285,000. 2. Davis Company purchased a new piece of equipment...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT