Question

In: Finance

Suppose a trader who owns 320,000 pounds of commodity A decides to hedge the value of...

Suppose a trader who owns 320,000 pounds of commodity A decides to hedge the value of her position with the futures contracts. One futures contract is for the delivery of 40,000 pounds of commodity B. The price of commodity A is $21.20 and the futures price is 18.30 (both dollars per pound). The correlation between the futures price and the price of commodity A is 0.92. The volatilities of commodity A and the futures are 0.31 and 0.38 per year, respectively. What is the optimal number of futures contracts with no tailing of the hedge?

A.

7

B.

6

C.

8

D.

9

Suppose a trader who owns 320,000 pounds of commodity A decides to hedge the value of her position with the futures contracts. One futures contract is for the delivery of 40,000 pounds of commodity B. The price of commodity A is $21.20 and the futures price is 18.30 (both dollars per pound). The correlation between the futures price and the price of commodity A is 0.92. The volatilities of commodity A and the futures are 0.31 and 0.38 per year, respectively. What is the optimal number of futures contracts with tailing of the hedge?

A.

9

B.

8

C.

7

D.

10

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. What is the number of futures contracts necessary to increase beta to 1.25?

A.

107

B.

77

C.

17

D.

30

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Should the fund manager take a long or short futures position to increase beta to 1.25?

A.

Short

B.

Long

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. What is the number of futures contracts necessary to completely hedge the portfolio’s market risk?

A.

77

B.

107

C.

30

D.

17

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Should the fund manager take a long or short futures position to completely hedge the portfolio’s market risk?

A.

Short

B.

Long

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Suppose that at the maturity of the futures contract, the future contract is trading at 3,305 and the portfolio has experienced a 1% decline in value. What is the net impact of the market decline on the completely hedged portfolio? In other words, what is the change in the value of the completely hedged portfolio?

A.

-$706,500

B.

$319,500

C.

-$315,000

D.

-$720,000

Solutions

Expert Solution

Q1-Suppose a trader who owns 320,000 pounds of commodity A decides to hedge the value of her position with the futures contracts. One futures contract is for the delivery of 40,000 pounds of commodity B. The price of commodity A is $21.20 and the futures price is 18.30 (both dollars per pound). The correlation between the futures price and the price of commodity A is 0.92. The volatilities of commodity A and the futures are 0.31 and 0.38 per year, respectively. What is the optimal number of futures contracts with no tailing of the hedge?

Answer-

Hedge Ratio =

where,

= Standard deviation or valatility of asset

=Standard deviation of Futures

r(A,F) = correlation between the futures price and the Asset price.

Hence hedge ratio =

optimal number of futures contracts = [(Hedge ratio* current Value of the asset)] / [Current value per contract]

=>[0.751* 320,000 pounds*$21.20 per pound] / [40,000 pounds* $18.30 per pound]

=> $5094784 / $732000 = 6.96 or 7 contract.

correct option- A.7 (SELL 7 CONTRACT)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-2

Suppose a trader who owns 320,000 pounds of commodity A decides to hedge the value of her position with the futures contracts. One futures contract is for the delivery of 40,000 pounds of commodity B. The price of commodity A is $21.20 and the futures price is 18.30 (both dollars per pound). The correlation between the futures price and the price of commodity A is 0.92. The volatilities of commodity A and the futures are 0.31 and 0.38 per year, respectively. What is the optimal number of futures contracts with no tailing of the hedge?

Answer-

Hedge Ratio =

where,

= Standard deviation or valatility of asset

=Standard deviation of Futures

r(A,F) = correlation between the futures price and the Asset price.

Hence hedge ratio =

optimal number of futures contracts = [(Hedge ratio* current Value of the asset)] / [Current value per contract]

=>[0.751* 320,000 pounds*$21.20 per pound] / [40,000 pounds* $18.30 per pound]

=> $5094784 / $732000 = 6.96 or 7 contract.

correct option- C.7 (Sell 7 contract)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-3.A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. What is the number of futures contracts necessary to increase beta to 1.25?

Number of Furures Contract Necessery=[ Value of portfolio*(New beta-Old beta)] / [value of one Index Futures]

=>[$72000000*(1.25-0.90)] / [ 250*3359]

=>30 contracts (Long or buy)

Correct Answer-D.30

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-4

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Should the fund manager take a long or short futures position to increase beta to 1.25?

Correct Answer. B . Take long position

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-5.A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. What is the number of futures contracts necessary to completely hedge the portfolio’s market risk?

Number of Furures Contract Necessery=[ Value of portfolio*(New beta-Old beta)] / [value of one Index Futures]

=>[$72000000*(0-0.90)] / [ 250*3359]

=> - 77.17 OR -77 Contract

(Negative means take Short Position).

Correct Answer-A.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-6A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Should the fund manager take a long or short futures position to completely hedge the portfolio’s market risk?

Correct Answer-A-Take Short position

--------------------------------------------------------------

Q-7

A fund manager of a $72 million equity portfolio with a beta of 0.9 considers changing the portfolio’s risk level using S&P 500 index futures. The S&P 500 index futures with the multiplier of 250 are trading at 3,359. Suppose that at the maturity of the futures contract, the future contract is trading at 3,305 and the portfolio has experienced a 1% decline in value. What is the net impact of the market decline on the completely hedged portfolio? In other words, what is the change in the value of the completely hedged portfolio?.

Ans-

Profit on Short position of 77 contract due to decrease in Index= (3359-3305)*250*77 = $1039500

Loss due to decline in Portfolio value = $72 million*1% = $720000

net profit = $1039500-$720000 = $319500

Correct answer-B -$319500


Related Solutions

A trader owns 55,000 units of a particular asset and decides to hedge the value of...
A trader owns 55,000 units of a particular asset and decides to hedge the value of her position with futures contracts on another related asset. Each futures contract is on 5,000 units. The spot price of the asset that is owned is $25 and the standard deviation of the change in this price over the life of the hedge is estimated to be $0.56. The future price of the related asset is $23.5 and the standard deviation of the change...
A trader wants to buy 500 shares of Stock A and decides to hedge the value...
A trader wants to buy 500 shares of Stock A and decides to hedge the value of her position with futures contracts on Stock B. Each futures contract of Stock B is on 25 shares. Suppose the spot price of Stock A is $5 per share, and the standard deviation of the change in this price over the life of the hedge is estimated to be $0.33. The futures price of Stock B is $4 per shares and the standard...
A trader decides to hedge her portfolio against large market moves by taking positions in the...
A trader decides to hedge her portfolio against large market moves by taking positions in the underlying asset and two options (see table below). Delta Gamma Vega Portfolio 0.50 -1000 -500 Option 1 -0.03 10 2.5 Option 2 0.10 80 10 a) How many units of options 1 and 2, respectively, are needed to make the portfolio both gamma and vega neutral? b) How many units of the underlying asset are needed to make the hedged portfolio from part (a)...
You are a professional stock trader who specializes in blue chip stocks. You want to hedge...
You are a professional stock trader who specializes in blue chip stocks. You want to hedge your exposure to drops in the market and have chosen to use Dow Jones Index options. If you choose to use call options, should you take a long or short position in the options? If you choose to use put options, should you take a long or short position in the options? Briefly discuss the differences in potential gains and losses between the option...
Fair Value Hedge: Short in Commodity Futures American Italian Pasta Company (AIPC) manufactures several varieties of...
Fair Value Hedge: Short in Commodity Futures American Italian Pasta Company (AIPC) manufactures several varieties of pasta. On January 1, 2020, AIPC had excess commodity inventories carried at acquisition cost of $1,000,000. These commodities could be sold or manufactured into pasta later in the year. To hedge against possible declines in the value of its commodities inventory, on January 6 AIPC sold commodity futures, obligating the company to deliver the commodities in February for $1,100,000. The futures exchange requires a...
Suppose True Security decides to hedge its exposure. Having recently learned about forwards you suggest that...
Suppose True Security decides to hedge its exposure. Having recently learned about forwards you suggest that True Security enter into a forward contract to fix the ¥/$. a) You see the following 90 days (3 months) forward bid and ask rates on ¥/$: Spot 113.0880 (Bid) 113.8290 (Ask) Forward 113.0573 (Bid) 113.7988 (Ask) At these rates what will be the final amount that True Security receives in dollars in 3 month time? b) Your colleague suggests an alternative hedging strategy....
suppose your company who owns a business in Mexico. The currentexchange rate is 22 Mexican...
suppose your company who owns a business in Mexico. The current exchange rate is 22 Mexican pesos per one US dollar. Describe a position in which a forward contract would be beneficial to your company. when would it produce a negative outcome?
Suppose that investors who determine the Spanish German exchange rates only care about the value-of-risk of...
Suppose that investors who determine the Spanish German exchange rates only care about the value-of-risk of their holdings of Spanish assets, how would this affect the equation which determines interest rate parity? How might this affect the consequences of monetary policy? [Hint: define Value-At-Risk and explain how this comes into play].
Consider a two-person problem in which there is a single seller who owns an indivisible object and single potential buyer of the object Each agent has a value for the object that is known to him but not known to the other agent.
Consider a two-person problem in which there is a single seller who owns an indivisible object and single potential buyer of the object Each agent has a value for the object that is known to him but not known to the other agent. The mechanism for (possible) trade is that each agent announces a price, and if the buyer's announcement is larger than the seller's announcement, the object is sold to the buyer at the seller's announced price. There is...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT