Question

In: Economics

Explain using an example how the Coase Theorem states that by properly assigning property rights will...

Explain using an example how the Coase Theorem states that by properly assigning property rights will result in an efficient outcome (HINT: I highly recommend that you use a diagram to help explain your answer). What are the two assumptions needed for the Coase theorem to hold?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Meaning: Coase Theorem as given by Sir Ronald Coase states that the parties involved in an economic activity can bargain and reach an efficient outcome without the cost factor involved and by properly assigning property rights.

Example:Consider two parties say a factory and fishermen. Suppose the factory has the property right to dump effluent into the river.

Let us say initially, the profits of both parties are:

Fishermen 's profit=$100

Factory' s profit=$500

As per the rationale of Coase THEOREM, that is, "bargaining without cost" (being installation of a filter by the factory and treatment plant by the fishermen ) resulting in lesser effluent greater output maximizing the joint profit of the factory and the fishermen .By installing a treatment plant, the fishermen can increase their profits to $200. Joint profit without cooperation will be $500+$200=$700.Moreover,the fishermen are willing to pay the factory up to $300 to install a filter-the difference between the $500 profit with a filter and the $200 profit without cooperation. Because the factory loses only $200 in profit by installing a filter, it will be willing to do so because it is more than compensated for its loss without cooperation. In this case, the gain to both parties by cooperating is equal to $100 :the $300 gain to the fishermen less the $200 cost of a filter. Suppose the ffactory and the fishermen agree to split this gain equally by having the fishermen pay the factory $250 to install the filter. This bargaining solution achieves the efficient outcome. Without cooperation, the fishermen earn the profit of $200 and the factory $500. With cooperation, the profit of both increases by $50. Now suppose the fishermen are given the property rights to clean water, which requires the factory to install the filter. The factory earns a profit of $300 and the fishermen $500. Because neither party can be made better off by bargaining, having the factory install the filter is efficient. Hence, proper assignment of property rights will result in an efficient outcome. Following table helps to understand the example in a better way.

NO COOPERATION RIGHT TO DUMP ($) RIGHT TO CLEAN WATER ($)
Profit of factory 500 300
Profit of fishermen 200 500
COOPERATION
Profit of factory 550 300
Profit of fishermen 250 500

Assumptions to Coase Theorem:1) Parties bargain without the cost factor involved.

2)Mutual advantage and economic efficiency is the main target.


Related Solutions

The Coase Theorem is a name often given to an argument that property rights or liability...
The Coase Theorem is a name often given to an argument that property rights or liability rules will generally be sufficient to manage what have conventionally been referred to as “external effects” (externalities) efficiently. Describe Coase’s argument, including the reciprocal nature of the problem as he outlined it, and the claim that outcomes will be independent of the allocation of rights/liabilities. Outline some of the limitations to the claim that private bargaining will achieve efficient outcomes.
Using an example of your choice, explain how, despite the Coase Theorum, the allocation of rights...
Using an example of your choice, explain how, despite the Coase Theorum, the allocation of rights can: Affect the distribution of income and Affect market demand for different products
Using an example of your choice, explain how, despite the Coase Theorum, the allocation of rights...
Using an example of your choice, explain how, despite the Coase Theorum, the allocation of rights can: Affect the distribution of income and Affect market demand for different products
True or False: The Coase theorem says that in the case of externalities, allocating property rights...
True or False: The Coase theorem says that in the case of externalities, allocating property rights of the externality always makes consumers and producers better off.
When can the Coase Theorem properly handle a situation where an externality exists? Provide an example....
When can the Coase Theorem properly handle a situation where an externality exists? Provide an example. In what types of situations can the Coase Theorem not properly handle an externality? How can they be addressed instead?
Describe an example of a problem that could be solved using the Coase theorem. Do this...
Describe an example of a problem that could be solved using the Coase theorem. Do this by defining a hypothetical situation where one individual is causing a negative externality on another individual. Describe whether it matters who holds property rights. Define the three necessary conditions for Coase theorem to work completely. Describe why a failure of these conditions will likely cause Coasian bargaining to fail.
Briefly explain the limitations of the Coase Theorem.
Briefly explain the limitations of the Coase Theorem.
18. State and explain the Coase Theorem. Come up with an example of your own for...
18. State and explain the Coase Theorem. Come up with an example of your own for which the Coase Theorem might best apply and explain how it would happen to solve the externality. Change your scenario in one small way to show how the Coase Theorem would collapse.
How can Coase theorem be used to resolve negative externalities and improve efficiency? Explain clearly.
How can Coase theorem be used to resolve negative externalities and improve efficiency? Explain clearly.
Illustrate, using numerical values, how the Coase theorem might apply in a world without transaction costs...
Illustrate, using numerical values, how the Coase theorem might apply in a world without transaction costs and Coasean bargaining possible. And state a reason that such a result might not obtain in the real world, and please provide an example. In such case, what could and should the legal system do? Please explain in detail.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT