Question

In: Finance

Assume you wish to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of two​...

Assume you wish to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of two​ stocks, Alpha Software and Beta​ Electronics, under three possible degrees of​ correlation: perfect​ positive, uncorrelated, and perfect negative. The average return and standard deviation for each stock appears​ here:

Assets Average Return Risk (S.D),s
Alpha 6.9% 30.8%
Beta 11.7% 49.3%

a. If the returns of assets Alpha and Beta are perfectly positively correlated​ (correlation coefficient equals plus 1=+1​), over what range would the average return on portfolios of these stocks​ vary? In other​ words, what is the highest and lowest average return that different combinations of these stocks could​ achieve? What is the minimum and maximum standard deviation that portfolios Alpha and Beta could​ achieve?

b. If the returns of assets Alpha and Beta are uncorrelated​ (correlation coefficient equals 0=0​), over what range would the average return on portfolios of these stocks​ vary? What is the standard deviation of a portfolio that invests​ 75% in Alpha and​ 25% in​ Beta? How does this compare to the standard deviations of Alpha and Beta​ alone?

c. If the returns of assets Alpha and Beta are perfectly negatively correlated​ (correlation coefficient equals negative 1=−1​), over what range would the average return on portfolios of these stocks​ vary? Calculate the standard deviation of a portfolio that invests​ 62.5% in Alpha and​ 37.5% in Beta.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. Perfect positive correlation means that both stocks behave same in return to the market responses. Perfectly, positive correlation means the portfolio risk could be maximum.

  • The average return on portfolio of these stocks would range between 6.9% - 11.7%, depends on the weight of stocks in the portfolio.
  • The minimum standard deviation of portfolio of these stocks could be 30.8% and the maximum could 49.3%

B. Uncorrelated stocks means there is no relation between the behavior of the stocks. They behave independent of each other in return to the market responses.

  • The average return on portfolio of these stocks would range between 6.9%-11.7%.
  • Standard deviaton of a portfolio that invests 75% in Alpha and 25% in Beta

=26.18

  • The risk of portfolio is less than what individual risk of each portfolio that with an average return of 8.1% that is more than stock Alpha with less risk.

C. Negative correlation means there is an inverse relationship between the stock. Both of them of respond exactly opposite in return to the market response. Perfectly negative correlation means portfolio risk could be minimum.

  • The average return on portfolio of these stocks would range between 6.9%-11.7%.
  • Standard deviaton of a portfolio that invests 62.5% in Alpha and 37.5% in Beta in correlation is -1

= (0.625*30.8)-(0.375*49.3)

=0.76%


Related Solutions

Assume you wish to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of assets...
Assume you wish to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of assets V and W under three assumed degrees of​ correlation: perfect​ positive, uncorrelated, and perfect negative. The following average return and risk values were calculated for these​ assets: Asset   Average Return, {r}}   Risk (Standard Deviation), s V   7.6%   4.7% W   13.2%   9.4% a. If the returns of assets V and W are perfectly positively correlated​ (correlation coefficient equals plus 1 ​), describe the range of​...
Matt Peters wishes to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of assets...
Matt Peters wishes to evaluate the risk and return behaviors associated with various combinations of assets V and W under three assumed degrees of correlation: Perfectly positive, uncorrelated, and perfectly negative. The expected returns and standard deviations calculated for each of the assets are shown in the following table: Asset V: Expected Return: 8% Risk: 5% Asset W: Expected Return: 13% Risk: 10% a. If the returns of assets V and W are perfectly positively correlated(coefficient =+1), describe the range...
The efficient frontier is composed of the best possible combinations of risk and return for well...
The efficient frontier is composed of the best possible combinations of risk and return for well diversified portfolios. As a result, the investor should always choose the portfolio on the efficient set that maximizes the Sharpe ratio. In a world of positive transaction costs how often should a portfolio manager rebalance their portfolio to make sure it is on the efficient frontier?
Assume that there two investments of different risk. A return of 0.05 is required on one...
Assume that there two investments of different risk. A return of 0.05 is required on one investment: on the other a return of 0.10 is required. Compare the present values obtained for each investment for expected cash flows of $1 billion 1 year, 20 years, and 50 years from now at the required rates of return.
An investor is concerned about the expected return and the risk associated with the investments. The...
An investor is concerned about the expected return and the risk associated with the investments. The investor wants to find out the optimal allocation of money in these two stocks. The investor's objective is to minimize the portfolio's risk while the portfolios expected return is at least 5%. Let s1 and s2 be the fraction of investments in stock 1 and stock 2, The investor wants to invest s1= 40% and s2= 60%. What is the investor's risk for this...
RISK AND RETURN Assume that you recently graduated with a major in finance. You just landed...
RISK AND RETURN Assume that you recently graduated with a major in finance. You just landed a job as a financial planner with Merrill Finch Inc., a large financial services corporation. Your first assignment is to invest $100,000 for a client. Because the funds are to be invested in a business at the end of 1 year, you have been instructed to plan for a 1-year holding period. Further, your boss has restricted you to the investment alternatives in the...
Assume you wish to purchase a property for $400,000 and you are evaluating two mortgage choices....
Assume you wish to purchase a property for $400,000 and you are evaluating two mortgage choices. You are only able to afford a 10% downpayment, so you have the following options. The first option is a 4.75% fully amortizing, monthly payment, fixed rate loan for 30 years with $2000 in origination fees and no points. This loan is for 90% of the purchase price. Alternatively, you can borrow 80% of the purchase price at a rate of 3.875%, with $4000...
For this case assume: You have located a home that you wish to purchase and wish...
For this case assume: You have located a home that you wish to purchase and wish to evaluate bank financing options in order to determine your budget. You’ve been working with a few banks on potential mortgage terms and wish to determine for yourself the payment schedule, monthly payment, and most importantly, just how much interest you will pay over the life of the mortgage. You also want to run a few scenarios to determine which is the best option...
Evaluate the various lipoproteins, where are they produced, what do they carry, what apolipoproteins are associated...
Evaluate the various lipoproteins, where are they produced, what do they carry, what apolipoproteins are associated (with their functions) and what is the lipoproteins overall physiological function (include type of lipid transport).
Assume that the risk-free rate of return (Krf) is 3% and the required rate of return...
Assume that the risk-free rate of return (Krf) is 3% and the required rate of return on the market (Km) is 8%. A given stock, say, Caterpillar (CAT) has a beta coefficient of 1.03. If the dividend per share during the coming year, meaning D1, is $4.12 and g = 3.50%, what is the current intrinsic value of the stock? Exactly how much was D0? How long will it take for the dividend to double, given the growth rate, approximately?...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT