In: Accounting
When a company factors accounts receivable without recourse:
A. |
The seller is said to have pledged its receivables. |
|
B. |
The factor is unable to recover any uncollected amounts from the seller. |
|
C. |
The factor collects amounts due and forwards them to the seller. |
|
D. |
Any risk of uncollectible accounts receivable resides with the seller |
B) The factor is unable to recover any uncollected amounts from the seller is the correct alternative.
Under non recourse factoring all the risk of non collections remain only in the hand of the factor. For any uncollectible they can't claim from the sellers.
Why the other alternatives are not true :
A) If the seller said to have pledge it's receivables that means he can purchase back it's receivables again from the factors if there is any non payment of collections. It is one of the feature of recourse factoring .
C) If the factor doesn't even collect from receivables still they have to pay to the seller.
D) Risk of uncollectible accounts receivable only remains with factors. In recourse factoring the risk of uncollectible remains with seller. But it is not holds true for non recourse factoring.