In: Accounting
Professional scepticism has received much attention from policy
makers, regulators, politicians and the public. After nearly a
decade of action, audit quality has undoubtedly improved even
though calls for more professional scepticism have not
abated.
Required:
(a) Discuss two (2) audit circumstances when professional scepticism is necessary.
b) Propose two (2) ways that can be used to enhance auditors’
professional scepticism.
c) Discuss one (1) positive and one (1) negative effect of
professional scepticism.
Professional skeptisim(ps) is an attitude that includes a
questioning mind being alert to conditions which may indicate
possible misstatemnt due to error or fraud and a critical
assessment of audit evidence.
a). Audit evidence that contradicts other audit evidence
obtained.
Conditions that may indicate possible fraud.
To reduce the risk of over generalising when drawing conclusions
from audit observations
Information that brings into question that reliability of documents
and responses to inquiries to be used in qudit evidence.
b) Ps enhances the likelihood the auditor will understand your
industry ,lines od business,business processes, and any nuances
that make company different from others,as it naturally causes the
auditor to ask questions that may otherwise go unasked.Thses
questions not only help the auditor apply standards,but alsohelps
to gain deeper knowledge of the business.
Subjectivity and judgement are more prevalent than ever ,given the
migration towards more principles based accounting and increase use
of fair values in financial reporting.
c) Negative-presumptive doubt associated with person capable to do
job and organisational trust which in turnlead to higher turnover
intentions
Positive-Ps impacts the quality of their audit services and to
obtain sufficient appropriate evidence which is not easily
attainable evidence.(questioning mind)