In: Economics
how are the distributions of gains from trade changing as far as labor and capital are concerned? can we still use the h-0 model? The topic is about globalization inequality. Please type the answer. Thanks
With the expansion of trade since 1980s another element of
International Trade has been observed and it is the increasing
economic inequality both in the developing world as well as
developed world. This fact is quite the opposite of the predictions
made by trade theory based on comparative advantage and heckscher
ohlin model. These theories suggested that countries that are
equipped with large amount of unskilled labour should experience an
increase in their wages related to the skilled labour which is not
abundant.
The advent of globalisation has led to the reduction of trade
barriers and an increase in trade and capital flows on the
international level. Models earlier developed predicted that the
relative abundance of factors of production will be their source of
comparative advantage and countries that are abundant in one factor
will specialise in the production of only those goods that are
using those factors intensively. These models predicted that these
relatively abundant factor will find their income level higher
while the scared factor will lose from trade.
However evidence has total disagreement on Wage and income
inequality that is increasing in developing countries especially
among the unskilled labour which is the relatively abundant factor
and supposedly the one which was expected to gain from trade. This
correlation between increasing trade and increasing income
inequality is not only a causality.
The reason for the differences in wages and increasing wage
inequality is believed to be driven by technological change. This
indicates that trade is not responsible for the rising wage
inequality but factors such as non trade elements of technical
change are more or less responsible for rising wage inequality
across developing countries. Therefore the predictions of heckscher
ohlin model are not entirely incorrect are still relevant.