In: Accounting
enario 1: (Total = 3 x
5 = 15 Marks)
Western Sydney Steaks (WSS), a national fast-food chain, has
experienced a number of problems in the past few years, and
management is considering the adoption of a balanced scorecard as
part of a turnaround effort. You are one of the renowned Management
Accountants in the city. WSS’s CEO has requested you to submit a
report highlighting the potential benefits of using balanced
scorecard over traditional management accounting tools. You need
address the following specific requirements:
Required:
1. Briefly explain the concept of a balanced scorecard. Discuss the
general factors that are included in a typical balanced scorecard.
2. Independent of your answer in requirement 1, assume that WSS is
very concerned about customer satisfaction. List four different
(and specific) customer satisfaction measures that may be
appropriate for the firm (and for other fast-food providers).
3. Independent of requirement 1, assume that WSS wants to return to
former levels of profitability. List several financial measures
that would allow management to assess success or failure with
respect to the following goals: (1) pay creditors on a timely
basis, (2) keep shareholders happy, and (3) improve profitability
over time at stores that have been open at least one year.
There are following benefits accruing to WSS through a value chain analysis:
▪ Value chain analysis is a process by which a firm identifies and analysis various
activities that add value to the final product. The idea is to identify those activities which
do not add value to the final product/service thereafter eliminating such non-value
adding activities. The analysis of value chain help a firm in obtaining cost leadership
or improve product differentiation. For WSS, value chain can provide with more
unambiguous picture of the value of the manufacturing function as perceived by
customers.
▪ This model also helps in analyzing other firms within the same industry. As WSS
observed that other firms in the industry are considered to be more cost effective in
terms of manufacturing, it may plan to use the value chain model to examine the reason
for the same.
▪ The value chain will assist WSS to determine ways to get best approach towards
developing higher level competitive performance. This model assists firms in finding
ways to develop higher level of performance either by cost leadership or product
differentiation. Right now, WSS is in a situation wherein it is being defeated on price
by some of its competitors, however is recognized as the best solutions provider to
customer's problems. Through detailed value chain analysis, WSS may be able to
ascertain the reason of falling down in such situation and partners may be able to take
decision regarding the future vision of the firm.
▪ Through this analysis, WSS may apply other relevant management techniques as well.
Post value chain analysis, WSS will be in a position to decide whether it is worthwhile
to continue the technique of benchmark (processes and performance) against its rivals,
to develop an information systems strategy, to carry out a business process re-
engineering process or to adopt activity-based management.
Further, WSS may decide to outsource manufacturing and keep focus on design and
services by following value chain analysis model. This technique may be appropriate
for WSS as by outsourcing manufacturing, WSS may be able to focus on its core area
for which it is well-known in the industry.
▪ Value Chain analysis will also facilitate the development of performance metrics for
WSS. By developing such metrics WSS may be able to identify which aspects of its
business model are not contributing to the overall value and profits of the firm. Although
currently WSS has suspicion that manufacturing and installation are the weak parts of
its operation, development of transparent and appropriate metrics would enable WSS
to recognize where value and profit are being added in the business model.
(ii) Number of criticisms of the value chain developed by Michael Porter have been:
▪ This value chain analysis cannot easily be applied to firms belonging to service
industries. This criticism is particularly imperative in the context of WSS which has
upward profits from rendering solutions and services rather than that from
manufacturing tangibles products. Many people appreciate that the model is more
suitable to manufacturing-based industries, rather than service based industries.
▪ Often this model is seen as complicated and perhaps could be a source of frustration
for the management of a firm. Although the staff of WSS includes bright and intelligent
experts, they may not see the value in-depth analyses of business which is required
for a full value chain analysis.
▪ This analysis has a linear approach and ignores the concept of value networks. This
criticism is specifically relevant to WSS because its major business resort to the
cooperative relationship that the experts have with their customers. If, WSS decides to
outsource manufacturing and focus on design and service, this will become even more
relevant where relationships are utmost important.
Often value chain analysis is perceived as time consuming and expensive as a whole.
However, if the analysis is to be completed timely, there will be requirement of reliable
data such as cost of components in business model. However, in the absence of good
cost capturing system, this model could prove to be a costly process. After completion
of this process, still there is no guarantee that the process lead to have upward trend
in profitability and where it does, it may take some time in realization.
(iii) WSS requires to acknowledge that the nature of its business is turning from manufacturing
zone to a solutions provider or professional services firm.
From this point of view, it would be better for WSS to analyze its business using the
Professional Services Value Chain/ Value Shop Model. The concept of Value Shop came in
to lime light holding the hand of Charles B. Stabell and Oystein D. Fjeldstad in 19 98.This
concept aims to serve firms from service sector. It only deals with problems, figure out the
main area requiring service and finally come with the solution. This approach is designed to
solve customer’s problems rather than creating value by producing output from an input of
raw materials.
A Value Shop mobilizes resources (say: people, knowledge or money) to solve specific
problems such as delivering a solution to business problem. This shop model is iterative,
involving repeatedly performing a generic set of activities until a solution is reached.
Secondary activities in the Professional Service Value Chain have same support activities
as those in the porter’s value chain, However the primary activities are described differently
to recognize the different nature of a service-oriented business. In value shop, primary
activities are performed in a circle within a firm to perform generic set of activities iteratively
before reaching a conclusion. Since WSS team communicate with customers to find a
solution before testing of developed prototypes, so they will find the vale shop, compatible
and effective model to use.